2

Running Ubuntu Linux 9.04, and I see these odd log lines in dmesg:

[ 18.673752] type=1505 audit(1240159967.221:2): operation="profile_load" name="/usr/share/gdm/guest-session/Xsession" name2="default" pid=2197
[ 18.730952] type=1505 audit(1240159967.278:3): operation="profile_load" name="/sbin/dhclient-script" name2="default" pid=2201
[ 18.731093] type=1505 audit(1240159967.278:4): operation="profile_load" name="/sbin/dhclient3" name2="default" pid=2201
[ 18.731141] type=1505 audit(1240159967.278:5): operation="profile_load" name="/usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action" name2="default" pid=2201
[ 18.731182] type=1505 audit(1240159967.278:6): operation="profile_load" name="/usr/lib/connman/scripts/dhclient-script" name2="default" pid=2201
[ 18.871720] type=1505 audit(1240159967.417:7): operation="profile_load" name="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" name2="default" pid=2206
[ 18.871913] type=1505 audit(1240159967.417:8): operation="profile_load" name="/usr/sbin/cupsd" name2="default" pid=2206
[ 18.909533] type=1505 audit(1240159967.458:9): operation="profile_load" name="/usr/sbin/tcpdump" name2="default" pid=2210

What generates them, and should I be worried?

3 Answers 3

7

It's AppArmor loading it's profiles as applications start up.

For those that don't know, is similar to in that it monitors and restricts based on a set of profiles, usually configured in /etc/apparmor.d.

The log entries you are seeing are good log entries and are showing that AppArmor is loading up and doing it's thing. Generally you can ignore them but it's always a good idea to remember AppArmor exists as it can bite you.

e.g. I reconfigured MySQL on a Ubuntu system to use /home/mysql for its data files and it wouldn't start, because AppArmor was blocking access to it. The MySQL logs just said "Permission Denied", whereas syslog told me that AppArmor was stopping it.

1
  • 1
    any way to make it not spam dmesg ? it is impossible to work on tty console while it spamms "ALLOWED"
    – zb'
    Feb 16, 2014 at 23:36
1

No, that's just the kernel's audit subsystem getting a little overly frisky.

0

As womble said, it's OK.

If you're running logcheck, add a regex to filter out these lines

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .