4

I'm somewhat new to programming, and all of my programming so far has been in Windows.

I have no formal training in computers, but I'm a bright guy, and I learn reasonably quickly. (I have a Ph.D. in math.)

What would be an introduction to Linux that does not presume prior non-Windows experience, but gets to the good/useful/powerful stuff?

5
  • 1
    What exactly do you want to learn? Desktop skills? Terminal skills? Running services? Development?
    – Andrioid
    Jul 11, 2009 at 10:18
  • 1
    Um . . . yes? I want to know the things that it would be typical for programmers to know. I can't specify these things, because I don't know them. Jul 11, 2009 at 10:38
  • I would imagine as a Math guy the things that may be important would be, laTex compilation, any sort of mathematical tools, and programming with a dynamic language like python. At least if staying in the academic world those are the first things that come to mind.
    – sclarson
    Jul 11, 2009 at 12:09
  • Yes you WOULD know what things to specify since you already know them from Windows! :) So specify those and let others translate it to linux...
    – Sniek NL
    Sep 24, 2009 at 11:49
  • Like I said, I'm somewhat new to programming. It didn't take long to learn how to do the things I knew how to do in Windows, but many give the impression that the Linux shell is much more powerful than the Windows command-line. I'm interested in learning the things that can't easily be done in Windows. (Maybe it's a myth, though, and I'm just pointing to my lack of Windows knowledge . . . Sep 24, 2009 at 13:08

5 Answers 5

5

I asked a similar question awhile back and, after reading the responses here, decided to setup up a Ubuntu server at work with ssh access. I have been using it daily for about a month to host a couple of small websites, as a file server, and just as a project. I ssh into it from different locations several times per day and do something...anything: move files around, edit config files with vi, just whatever.

Maybe I am a geek, but I still find it totally fascinating a month later.

Here is my question, not exactly like yours, but I was Window-only adimin also...

Windows Admin looking to start out small with Linux (ubuntu) file server

3

It would help if your question was a little bit more specific, but I'll give it a go.

Some will point out that this is not sysadmin related, but I disagree. Setting up development environments for programmers and providing support is a part of the job for many of us.

  1. Pick a distribution and install it. You could try a live-cd, but not many development environments can be run from that.

  2. Know what you're going to program for, is it strictly a Linux program? Is it a desktop program?

  3. Select your toolkit and libraries.

  4. Check out Stack Overflow, the programming related sister-site of this web page.

  5. Starting on Linux (from my experience) can be difficult. But remember, while Linux may not have the biggest user share, almost every single user, posts his problems on an open forum. This means, you can Google (search) for pretty much any problem you can think of. In my opinion, it is easier to find help online for Linux, than it is for Windows (depending on your distribution, Ubuntu recommended for beginners).

  6. Pick an IDE (Development Environment), I for example like Geany (that comes with Gnome/Ubuntu) but numerous alternatives exist.

It's not a very specific answer, but the question wasn't very specific so I hope it will point you in the right direction. Most of us "Linux dudes" were Windows users at some point and I believe that your logical thinking and math degree will help you out.

Just think 'Matlab' if you're ever stuck in the terminal.

1

Many of the resources mentioned in this question are beginner-friendly.

1

Some have found Unix for the Beginning Mage to be helpful in this regard.

0

I'll add that the <distribution name> Unleashed series from SAMS Publishing take a good overview-to-depth appraoch.

It where I started with Linux many moons ago, and still much of what was covered in the '96 edition is still valid. A bunch has changed/improved/etc, but those book have been a valuable resource to me many times.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .