1

I have a hyper-v cluster operating on win2k8 R2 in a 2003 forest. These servers are at our NOC with a DC that connects to our PDC at HQ via a persistent VPN. The cluster boxes are reporting a error event ID 1006 shown below. The DC is also reporting an error 5805 also shown below. I have found numorus posts regarding 1006 errors, but none for error ID 52's. It's weird, I can ping and I can browse network shares on the DC from each. I thought maybe a DNS or net work issue, but nslook up works too.

Event 1006

 <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
 <System>
 <Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy" Guid="{AEA1B4FA-97D1-45F2-A64C-4D69FFFD92C9}" /> 
 <EventID>1006</EventID> 
 <Version>0</Version> 
 <Level>2</Level> 
 <Task>0</Task> 
 <Opcode>1</Opcode> 
 <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords> 
 <TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-12-17T00:08:19.582292600Z" /> 
 <EventRecordID>41808</EventRecordID> 
 <Correlation ActivityID="{26B10592-6228-4A3E-845B-E04B49702A54}" /> 
 <Execution ProcessID="964" ThreadID="1384" /> 
 <Channel>System</Channel> 
 <Computer>NEOREEFVH1.neoreef.com</Computer> 
 <Security UserID="S-1-5-18" /> 
 </System>
 <EventData>
 <Data Name="SupportInfo1">1</Data> 
 <Data Name="SupportInfo2">5012</Data> 
 <Data Name="ProcessingMode">0</Data> 
 <Data Name="ProcessingTimeInMilliseconds">1138</Data> 
 <Data Name="ErrorCode">52</Data> 
 <Data Name="ErrorDescription">Unavailable</Data> 
 <Data Name="DCName" /> 
 </EventData>
 </Event>

Event 5805

 Event Type:    Error
 Event Source:  NETLOGON
 Event Category:    None
 Event ID:  5805
 Date:      12/16/2013
 Time:      2:32:01 PM
 User:      N/A
 Computer:  NEOREEFSRV15
 Description:
 The session setup from the computer NEOREEFVH3 failed to authenticate. The following error occurred: 
 Access is denied. 

 For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
 Data:
 0000: 22 00 00 c0               "..À    

Here are the networks on the hosts: Networks on hosts

Any with a "Enabled" Are virtual switches.

1
  • Where you ever able to get this resolved? I'm facing this same problem but on a large scale in an enterprise.
    – user238820
    Aug 22, 2014 at 1:58

1 Answer 1

0

Ended up being a VPN reliability and routing issue. We switched from using RRAS to dedicated VPN devices and configured new routes between points. Once we did this, the issue went away.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .