Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a relatively light duty Hyper-V server running 2 production servers and 3 dev servers. I've been using the RSAT with the Hyper-V role installed, and it seems to do just fine when it comes to managing the server's storage and VMs. I decided to setup a new machine and do some eval on SCVMM. Now that its up and running, I don't see any added value to it compared to RSAT on my Win7 box. Is it just not geared toward a small setup like mine, and really just meant for a much larger VM environment?

EDIT: Besides the ability to to P2V.

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

SCVMM is targeted at automating operations across many hosts. A single host, or even a handful of hosts, won't be enough to see much difference.

And, by the way, if you're really dealing with only a few VMs, you'll probably get exactly what you want in P2V using disk2VHD. See this:

Just remember to change the storage driver set to include IDE/ATA before you take turn the disk into a VHD, or it won't boot within Hyper-V.

share|improve this answer
Disk2vhd is very cool but one other thing to note is that it's limited to disks < 127GB in size. – Helvick Jan 20 '10 at 21:31
Actually, I think its VirtualPC thats limited to that disk size, not the utility. – DanBig Feb 4 '10 at 13:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.