Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm looking for a collaboration tool similar to Google Docs but with one major difference: be able to run the collaboration document editing tool on intranet - nobody from outside the intranet should be able to access the data.

I'm aware about SharePoint but I heard that it is very expensive.

Also, wikis are good but they are missing two important features: concurrent editing and spreadsheet support.


locked by HopelessN00b Mar 14 '15 at 16:17

This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. This question and its answers are frozen and cannot be changed. More info: help center.

closed as off-topic by masegaloeh, HopelessN00b Mar 14 '15 at 15:50

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 2 down vote accepted

WSS is free.

Probably I will take a look at it after I install Windows 2003 Server on a virtual machine. – sorin Jan 21 '10 at 13:53
We use it internally. It's not the full blown product like Sharepoint Portal Server or MOSS, but it's fairly feature rich. – joeqwerty Jan 21 '10 at 13:58
WSS is a great solution. Also note that spreadsheets on fileshares already support concurrent editing however I usually strongly discourage it, If you are doing concurrent editing in excel 9 times out of 10 you.are using the wrong app. I try to push the users over to sql server express or (if I have no other choice ) access. See "Use a shared workbook to collaborate" in excel help for details – Jim B Jan 21 '10 at 14:19
...for some definition of "free." You still need a Windows Server box to run it on. – ktower Jan 21 '10 at 15:24
@ktower: True, but to carry this to it's logical conclusion: you need a physical host machine which is not free, you need power which is not free, you need a location to house it in which is not free, etc., etc. In the spirit of my answer WSS is free. ;) – joeqwerty Jan 21 '10 at 15:40

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.