Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Anybody knows how performance is on Linux ?

I mean, which server gives you the best performance/delivery time (Apache/Apache2, xsp2, lighthttp, nginx, other) ?
Since all goes via xsp2, I'd say xsp2 would certainly be fastest, but it's probably missing a lot of features, which lighthttp offers (e.g. mod_dosevasive, URL-rewriting, etc.).

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The best combination I have found, currently using in production, is fastcgi-mono-server2 or fastcgi-mono-server4 using nginx. A good alternative, that also is known to perform better than apache is, lighttpd.

I use Ubuntu Server 11.10 for my web servers due to very good package support (and updated) packages for the required components needed for the job.

You can found working configuration files examples for Demis Bellot here. He uses Centos.

share|improve this answer
+1, this has been my experimental finding, too. Though I use fastcgi-mono-server4 with nginx :) – Quandary Dec 24 '11 at 7:51

I haven't tested it, but I would think it depends on what functions you're accessing in Mono. I wouldn't be surprised if the application would have to actually be tested with different web servers and configurations specific to the application in question to profile performance. There may be a particular function or behavior that can affect your profiled performance.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.