Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Serving static files from an independent host from the rest of my website is supposed to improve performance. I'm cheap, so I was wondering if I can do that within one standard hosting service. Thoughts?

share|improve this question
I am currently busy with a project on the same topic. I have successfully configured nginx to serve the static files. Can you tell me the type of environment you work in and I will give you some advice on what the best way is to go. – Saif Bechan Apr 2 '10 at 9:13
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Short answer, it depends. If your current Server is a very bloated Apache setup with lots of modules loaded for serving dynamic content and a load of rewrite rules that get evaluated on every request then you can gain quite some performance by running a second server instance like NGINX ( which only uses few MB of core memory and will serve static content to thousands of concurrent clients while barely consuming any CPU.

share|improve this answer

You could yes, not sure you'd gain any performance however, in fact I'd bet you'd lose a tiny bit of performance due to multi-instance overheads.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.