Most mail servers will accept mail addressed to "postmaster". However, in my experience, Exchange servers rarely do. Is there a common address similar to postmaster that exchange servers will accept mail for?
|
feedback
|
|
postmaster is among the standard aliases that all SMTP servers should have available. Microsoft often ignores established Internet standards with their software. Point being, it is rarely safe to assume that the Microsoft approach is the right way. From RFC822:
Edit 2 I personally like to have postmaster, mailer-daemon, abuse, root, hostmaster, and webmaster. The aliases, of course, are based on what type of servers I typically run. You could argue root is superfluous but I like to do it anyway. postmaster, abuse, and mailer-daemon are always a requirement in my world. webmaster and hostmaster are dependent on whether or not you run DNS or a Web site. These days, if you're responsible for an Internet domain, chances are these will apply to you as well. | |||||||||
feedback
|
|
You can add whatever account you wish. Postmaster@, abuse@, etc. Just add to an account or have a separate one. You have to configure each of these as you wish. You can have all or none. None are configured by default | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
Exchange 2007, at least on SBS 2008, comes with a "Postmaster and Abuse Reporting" distribution group out of the box. All you have to do is add a user to that distribution group to receive the e-mails. If they don't want their main inbox to get spammed with the messages, they can add a rule via Outlook to move it to a sub-folder. The reason it usually doesn't go anywhere by default is that the only default member is another distribution group that requires senders to be authenticated, blocking most mail from the open Internet. Adding an explicit user to the distribution group solves the problem without having to create separate AD accounts for postmaster@, abuse@, etc. | |||
|
feedback
|