Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm running RHEL 5.3 over vSphere 4.0U1. I configured multiple LUNs on my NetApp (Fibre) storage, and added the RDM on two (Linux) VMs, using the Paravirtual SCSI adapter. One LUN is 100GB in size, successfully mapped to /dev/sdb on both VMs, 5 more are 500MB in size (mapped to /dev/sd{c-g}. I also created one partition per device.

I have encountered two issues: First, writing directly to /dev/sdb1 gives me ~50MB/s, while any of the /dev/sd{c-g}1 gives me ~9MB/s. There is no difference in configuration of the LUNs apart from their size. I am wondering what causes this but this is not my main problem, as I would settle for 9 MB/s.

I created raw devices using udev pretty straightforwardly:

ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sdb1", RUN+="/bin/raw /dev/raw/raw1 %N"

per device

Writing to any of the new raw devices dramatically slows down performance to just over 900KB/s.

Can anyone point me in a helpful direction?

Thanks in advance,

-- jifa

share|improve this question
    
Is there a specific reason why you need the Paravirtualized adapter rather than the LSILogic SCSI adapter? Also why do you need to use RDM's here - is this part of some solution that requires direct access to the raw disk? –  Helvick Mar 17 '10 at 10:27
    
I read somewhere it gives better performance. I tried switching now, and it drops the small RDMs to ~4MB/s and the raw devs to ~250KB/s. –  jifa Mar 17 '10 at 10:51
    
a bit of research leads me to think udev is not the problem, as the raw devices are created. –  jifa Mar 17 '10 at 12:29
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Turns out my performance assessment was wrong to begin with. I used the great article at http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=481867 that explains I/O performance and figured out writing with small block sizes substantially degrades performance. Increasing the measurement block size proved normal r/w speeds - problem solved.

share|improve this answer
    
It's all about the IOPS, the drive heads (wherever they are) are a pretty restrictive bottlekneck. Unless you're using SSD's or an array of hundreds of spinning disks then small IO sizes == low bandwidth. Good to see you figured it out on your own. –  Helvick Mar 21 '10 at 13:37
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.