Sign up ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm getting ready to request a new batch of administrative e-mail addresses to replace an outdated hierarchy within my organization. I have the opportunity of choosing new aliases for 24/7 alert recipients, monitoring recipients, all team members, etc.

What does your org use for these purposes?

Groups in my org use things like: org-dept@, org-dept-all@, org-dept-alert@, org-dept-monitoring@, org-dept-status@.


locked by HopelessN00b Jan 21 at 15:51

This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. This question and its answers are frozen and cannot be changed. More info: help center.

closed as too localized by John Gardeniers, Zypher, MattB, squillman, Zoredache Apr 8 '10 at 19:04

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

You really need to work out a scheme that works for your particular situation, which is different to anyone else's situation. As we know absolutely nothing about your organisation or its structure any answer would be wildly speculative at best. –  John Gardeniers Apr 6 '10 at 22:03
(my 2c) I dont think this is too localised; I've dealt with several similar issues in a variety of different scales of organisation, areas, and situations, and I'm small-fry on SF so I'm sure many others have come up against this brain-drain. –  Andrew Bolster Apr 8 '10 at 22:02
Of course, I have to agree with Andrew. :-) This is an extremely common issue for admins to face and the only reason it might be considered to be "narrow" is that most seem not to care about best practices or making a thoughtful choice. Instead of being able to benefit from the experience of the illustrious members of these forums, someone with similar questions must look elsewhere, in less professional circles. That seems arbitrary and unfortunate, and lessens the value these communities can offer. –  hourback Apr 9 '10 at 12:51
I completely disagree with answers to questions such as mine being "wildly speculative". For uninterested experts to determine what information would be useful to me is bizarre. The fact that the answer I chose referred not to some wacky, actually localized convention, but rather to what could be considered to be a canonical list of e-mail message categories (syslog), is further evidence that there is nothing wildly speculative going on here. If it were so speculative then I would not have found Andrew's advice to be so suitable for my (very common) situation. –  hourback Apr 9 '10 at 13:00

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

It depends on the conditions; I worked at a large multinational company and we had to go a stage further than that, because we had, and that had to go to a subset of, and all mail had to go the other direction.

(Somehow it all worked great; we actually dropped the org names, and when we were talking about a specific project, it went to, and if it had to go to a whole department, it was

To actually answer your question, for alerts we went for the syslog standard; our mail system supported *-emerg|alert|crit|err|warn|notice|info|

(actually, dunno who added it in but it was great; full names were expanded, so that *-emergency would redirect to emerg, etc)

Thanks a lot, Andrew! That is very helpful. I never thought about using syslog's convention. Your "org versus project" issue is something I'm grappling with -- sounds very dramatic! -- now. I think I favor your solution for this also. –  hourback Apr 8 '10 at 14:57
When i started at $COMPANY they had an almost reversed system of what your talking about;, but then switched to a more 'free' convention of project names and departments To my knowledge once it was set up and the allocation of names standardised, it actually reduced the mailadmin's workload (only spoke to him at xmas party so his speech and my hearing may have been impaired) Glad to help! –  Andrew Bolster Apr 8 '10 at 22:05

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.