Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Are there any studies or evidence which show that mounting a hard drive horizontally is better than vertically for the lifespan of the device? Or upside down, or any direction for that matter.


locked by Tom O'Connor Aug 10 '13 at 1:12

This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. This question and its answers are frozen and cannot be changed. More info: help center.

great question, +1 – barfoon May 28 '09 at 17:39
Vertical orientation certainly works well for BackBlaze:… – MikeyB Feb 14 '10 at 3:20

17 Answers 17

up vote 28 down vote accepted

The quotes in this thread from WD and Seagate suggest not.

To precis the link: Seagate, Maxtor and WD drives can be used in any orientation including upside down.

I have a hard time trusting vendors at their word. If the FDA didn't regulate medical claims, I'm sure they'd claim their drives prevented cancer if they thought it would help sales. Fortunately, there are groups like Google publishing some 3rd party surveys that give a much clearer picture. Nothing on orientation that I've seen, though. – jldugger May 28 '09 at 17:26
There are reference server designs (mostly 4U+, but with 2.5" disks also 2U) which mount disk drives sideways, so this should be a non-issue. But as you already said, to get meaningful results you'd have to monitor failures in large environments like Amazon S3/EC2, Google or CERN. – Michael Renner May 31 '09 at 1:27

Orientation does not affect a drive. Think about iPods with hard drives. They are changing orientation all the time. The most important thing in a drives life is writing to the sectors. Current versions of NTFS do a write leveling (Novell was doing it in the 80's) that will use all the disk surface. Older OS's and file systems under Windows reused portions of the disk when files were erased.

With write leveling the center of the disk gets used as well as the outsides. This will increase the disk life for multiple reasons that are off this topic.


Excellent call with the iPod reference. – Electrons_Ahoy May 29 '09 at 5:27
Drives intended for portable devices are often constructed differently. Perhaps your iPod's drive is not lasting as long as it could. – carlito Jun 1 '09 at 20:31
Didn't they ditch HDs in iPods for a reason? – ceejayoz Nov 6 '11 at 2:52
@ceejayoz - nope, my dad just bought an 80Gb iPod classic a few weeks ago to use in his new car. They have been ditched from iPod Touch and iPhone/iPad but I think that's for space and speed reasons. – Mark Henderson Nov 6 '11 at 3:15
It is an excellent point, though the hard drives in iPods are quite different to the hard drives used in desktops/servers. I know, for example, that smaller hard drives can take a LOT more shock and vibration than larger ones. 2.5" drives can take about 10 times as much as 3.5" drives. It's logical that other characteristics would vary with drive size/type as well. – thomasrutter Dec 15 '11 at 4:11

I've never heard of that being a problem.

With older drives however, I do remember the life of a drive coming to an end if it had been running in one orientation for a prolonged period of time, and then turned. For example a server that had been running for several years, when relocated and rotated into a new position, soon after disks would begin to fail.

But I haven't seen that with newer drives.


Early PC hard drives such as the ST506 were based on stepper motors. These did not have any feedback mechanism for head vs track position and thus had to be used in the same orientation that they were formatted in. Voice coil harddrives have a feedback loop that allow them to correct for errors such as changes in orientation.

I would expect that a vertically aligned drive will have to expend a small amount of power to correct for the effect of gravity in a manner that a horizontally aligned drive would not. However since as at least as many disk arrays seems to be vertically oriented as horizontal, I would expect such an effect to be minor.

The magnets in most hard drive's voice coil are setup to pull the heads to the park zone when power is disconnected, so the heads are parked even if shutdown is unexpected. This constant pull makes the force of gravity due to orientation of the drive negligible at worst. – Chris S Feb 14 '10 at 1:24

Vertical is fine for the life of the drive if you need it. Enterprise class storage arrays often have the drives mounted vertically.

From a purely mechanical engineer's point of view, drives do have their head positioned in a certain position to the cylinders. If their heads were heavy, and sagging was a problem I'd say that horizontal position would be better. But those masses are neglieable, so it probably doesn't matter even in most idealistic test cases.

Conclusion: don't worry about it.

Drives read the position of the head from the platter itself. It's not an absolute position like floppy drives used to be. – Chris S Feb 14 '10 at 1:20
often? I never heard of a single rack mountable storage device (DAS/SAN/NAS) with horizontal drives. – monomyth Feb 14 '10 at 18:49
"If their heads were heavy, and sagging was a problem I'd say that horizontal position would be better" But by a similar argument, the distance between the head and the surface is extremely crucial, and you wouldn't want the same sag to affect that clearance (though I understand there is a "bubble" of air between them). – thomasrutter Dec 15 '11 at 4:13
@thomasrutter - Those head handles are grossly overdimensioned, so I doubt there is a risk of any sagging. Even in picometers, or whatever their dimensional unit is. – Rook Dec 15 '11 at 5:11

I have found that, when recovering a failing drive (one that sometimes spins down after power-up, or is excessively noisy, or that recalibrates with a click every second), they can be encouraged to spin up & stay up and running if you do re-orient them.

Another weird but wonderful trick is to put them in a freezer for a while. When the drive is powered back on it can generally be read for a while until it heats up again. You can extend their "cool" operation by putting one of those "freezer bricks" on top of the drive. Of course you have to watch out for condensation so plastic bags & tea towels are useful too.

+1 for the freezer trick. I was always suspicious until it saved my life once! – Dan Nov 6 '11 at 15:06

I have fibre channel storage arrays here that mount both vertically (FC) and horizontally (FATA). If the big-boys don't care, then there isn't a fundamental difference.

The one area where it might come into play is changing the orientation halfway through the drive's life. That might cause a slight misalignment. However, with drive densities where they are these days read heads are doing statistical analysis anyway to figure out which block it is reading, and a slight misalignment is probably 'noise' in that analysis. It may have mattered more back when densities were in the 2GB range, but not when we're throwing around 1TB SATA drives.

"That might cause a slight misalignment".. Sorry, but if a slight misalignment was possible it would have a much greater effect on the higher density drives of today than the lower density drives of yesteryear simple due to the precision necessary for smaller track widths. – NotMe May 28 '09 at 20:23
Modern drives do servo (closed-loop) alignment of tracks so gravity won't matter. Changing the orientation of a worn BEARING will make a difference: see Brad Gilbert's post. – Tim Williscroft May 29 '09 at 3:03

My company makes systems where a PC is mounted in an industrial control cabinet. In most cases the HD in the PC is in a vertical orientation.

Since we had some drive failure issues we tried to see if there is a correlation between the orientation and failures. The conclusion, though based on very limited number of cases, was that the orientation had no influence on failures.

Heat and vibrations are the main causes of the failures probably.

The vibrations caused by a rack full of drives all seeking simultaneously can be quite significant with respect to the (perceived) reliability of drives. – carlito Jun 1 '09 at 20:32
Add "power fluctuations" to the list of drive failure causes, unless the computers in question are running on well-filtered power. – Eddie Jun 7 '09 at 4:42

From my own personal experience I would say that horizontally is better.

I had my drive for over 2 years now. It was only a few weeks ago that it started to get stuck (while playing a video file it would get stuck after a minute [1]) . It started making loud noises (louder than usual) as well. Then a few days ago it stopped showing the files in the drive. After restarting the files would show up again but when I open a file it gets stuck again. This kept happening many times.

I thought it was just Windows 7 screwing up but I tried accessing on Ubuntu, the same problem happens. Then I placed it horizontally and it honestly started working properly again. It doesn't get stuck and doesn't make those loud noises. The same video file also played without getting stuck.

I've been using my drive in a vertical position since I bought it. But the problems only started a few weeks ago. It would seem that the drive just got too old. But it started working normally after placing it in a horizontal position.

So I would say the orientation does matter.

That is just from my personal experience. My drive is a Seagate 1TB external drive which I bought in 2009. It came with a plastic stand which you use to place the drive vertically.

[1] The video file wasn't corrupted and i tried accessing other files in different locations too.


Just a comment on my experience. 5 years ago I had a Toshiba laptop. Some problem on the hard drive prevented it from booting. The temporary solution ended up being to turn it on its side. This was very temporary, since if I placed it level, it would slow down to less than a tenth of normal speed. Currently, I have a Gateway that has a similar problem - sometimes failing to recover from hibernate or sleep, and almost always (recently) failing to complete a reboot. 2 weeks ago, after multiple attempts to get it to boot, I turned it on its side. It booted immediately - at which point I made all the backups I needed. Yesterday, I had the same problem, and spent 24 hours trying to get it to reboot. Only after repeated failure did I remember to turn the laptop on its side. It booted immediately! It runs fine on a level surface, it's only the bootup that is a problem.

I've not yet replaced the hard drive, but will check it for integrity - probably using Spinrite - before discarding it.


From what I remember back in the day the orientation of a drive when it was formatted was the orientation the drive was suppose to run with. Of course this was well over a decade ago (over 2?). I have not seen any actual test of this, but it's fair to say it doesn't matter anymore.

I think we can believe the manufacturers with this one.

Yes, this used to be true. Since it's impossible for the consumer to format any modern hard drive (they are formatted at the factory, only), we would have to ask the manufacturer what orientation they use to format. Which I doubt they'd tell us. And yes, modern hard drives still accept a "format" command, but it doesn't mean they lay down a low level format when they process it. They don't. – Eddie Jun 7 '09 at 4:39

Actually I have found that if you have a hard drive that is starting to make a lot of noise, that if you just tip it to some angle other than 0° or 90° that it will run much quieter.

So in other words, if you're paranoid, you could tilt every thing by 15° to 75°.

I personally wouldn't worry about it unless you need to work with older drives.


I do a lot of computer service for peoples. About 18 years ago when I start in IT someone told me about position of hard drives and their lifespan. Since then I've been monitoring this and I almost certain that some hard drive positions are not good.

99% Faulty Laptop hard drives I do replace are from laptops where hard drive is mounted up side down. There is no way to change this as laptops have been designed this way.

Offender number one are TOSHIBA laptops. All laptops from this company which I cam across have hard drives mounted up side down.

May it be that just 99% of all laptops have HDD mounted upside down, so there is actually no correlation at all? – SaveTheRbtz Jun 29 '13 at 14:20
@SaveTheRbtz Having dissected quite a few laptops myself, I can say that upside down mounting isn't typical. – Michael Hampton Jun 29 '13 at 15:12

You can use a drive horizontally or vertically, it is made to be used that way.

However, we* found that using a drive at a non-90°C degree (like with an angle of 30°), it wears faster, probably because it puts a bit more strain on the head when moving around.

*at the data recovery company I was working at


That really depends on the drive design so general rules are difficult. As many people said drives are generally expected to work flat or vertically either way.

However I seem to remember that some manufacturers advise against running drives upside down. and thinking of how drives are built I can see there might be issues.


I once witnessed how a server hard drive failed after running tilted at 45° for about an hour. Maybe it was just a coincidence, but I always run my hard disks in either horizontal or vertical orientations.


I don't know about extending a drive's lifespan, but I have a five-year-old drive that I've always used horizontally, but which now seems to only start up if I place it vertically.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.