Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What are the pros and cons on this?

I am thinking on security, ease of replacement and maintainance, ...


locked by HopelessN00b Dec 5 '14 at 12:26

This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. This question and its answers are frozen and cannot be changed. More info: help center.

closed as primarily opinion-based by HopelessN00b Dec 5 '14 at 12:26

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This doesn't work for all cases since it requires a network connection, but I've been doing development/testing in a sandbox domain running entirely on virtual machines. I have two virtual NICs on the dev machine spanning the sandbox and corporate network and sufficient resources to run Visual Studio comfortably. So I just Remote Desktop in to work.

I've been impressed with the experience because I can easily revert to older snapshots if necessary (as I had to do recently when I forgot to turn off automatic updates). As long as source files are checked in, there is nothing on the machine that needs to be persisted.

This doesn't fit all usage scenarios, but for ease of replacement and maintenance it's very good.

I agree, remote access into your work PC is good for development, but you lose the dual monitor capability and associated work space. – Brettski May 29 '09 at 6:15
@Brettski - you can span monitors with RDP by running: Mstsc /span (I haven't tried it so I'm not sure how well it works). However, I typically use VS in one window and email/browser/references in the other and there is no reason that stuff needs to be running on the dev machine as long as copy-paste works (which it can in RDP). – dmo May 29 '09 at 6:23
..and the mandatory reference to SplitView, so you can actually use a /span window as two monitors (full screen maximize, etc). – Tiberiu Ana May 29 '09 at 6:49

Before you consider any other points, first decide if you can justify the increased security risk from laptops.

If employees have laptops they can take home, there is significantly increased risk for either the hardware or data getting stolen or copied. Outside of your corporate network the machines are at a higher risk of infection for virii, spyware, etc. If they connect to the net in a public place they risk sending data in cleartext that should never be seen outside your company. And if the unthinkable happens and a laptop is physically stolen, there is a very small - but very real - chance of the source code to your company's entire code base getting in to the wrong hands.

I don't want to sound like the end of the world here, but letting your data leave the company premises is a major potential risk. There are ways to secure this (forcing data to go through a company VPN, etc), but those will take time and effort from you.

Good point: letting your data leave the company is BAD – Peter Gfader May 29 '09 at 6:25

With reasonable laptops going so cheap nowadays, I would suggest that the middle way is the best: a powerful desktop for day-to-day operations and a laptop too for travel, work from home, VPN+RDP to the desktop from anywhere, etc.

This solution has better chances of keeping developers productive and data safe, since a stolen laptop will be less likely to have tons of information on it. Convenience will always erode security -- it is easier to keep everything nicely encrypted (TrueCrypt FTW!) on a side machine, that is not in constant use.

This is my setup, and for me at least it is ideal. True, I miss the double huge monitors when I am at home, but being able to work in bed with the kids asleep and cuddled up makes up for it in spades :) – Joel in Gö May 29 '09 at 8:06

Notebooks: Developers can easily work at home (even after hours :-)


What I always liked about laptops for developers is all you need is an extra monitor to run dual, a huge benefit.

Most laptops come with 5400 RPM drives which just doesn't cut it and increases compiling time, so be mindful of the build. Sure you can lock the laptop down with drive encryption and other things, but they just make the developer whinny and they go out of their way to disable them.


I prefer a desktop for home and a desktop for work. This way, I can have dual monitors running. I know peeps say 'use the notebook display + an external', but that's not big enough / good enough, for me.

Security? Because it's not mobile, it's as secure as the location you work at. if anything, i won't loose it or break it (eg. drop it, etc).

Work from home? sure!! VPN + Remote Desktop to your machine.

Can u work at a cafe? nope :( Care factor though? zero :)

I love the new Macbook pro's and want one bad. But i couldn't do my programming on it because i'm greedy now and need 2x 24" LCD's. I can't go back. I've bitten the apple.

If u don't need 2x LCD's, then i would be all over a macbook pro for everything.

HTH :)

It is quite common to have two external monitors connected to a laptop -- but you most likely need a docking station for that. Just as an example,…. One monitor uses VGA out, the other one DVI out. – Tiberiu Ana May 29 '09 at 6:56

How about using a notebook connected to a big 19+ LCD at the office ? You can get both the comfort of working with big monitor and the ease of carrying your computer anywhere you like.

I used to work with a dell XPS (switched to a macbook pro now) and connect it to a 19" samsung LCD at the office.


I think a high spec'd laptop is the way to go as long as it has a easy docking station when in the office or at home which easily connects to mulitple monitors and external keyboard and mouse.


  1. You have a mobile dev environment.
  2. No synching for the developer from desktop to laptop to home etc. They can just use their laptop everywhere.
  3. Developer has more freedom to work when ever and where ever they want if you company allows that.


  1. Cost (more expensive hardware. Laptop is more expensive of course, plus you need buy multiple extra monitors, keyboards, etc)
  2. Reliability (fixing a laptop can be more difficult than a desktop)
  3. Easy to lose / steal

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.