Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Does anybody know any good free or open source Clam alternative?

Updete:

There is good list at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_antivirus_software of course.

share|improve this question
1  
Why not ClamAV itself, if I might ask? –  flight May 29 '09 at 14:26
add comment

closed as not constructive by TheCleaner, growse, mdpc, RolandoMySQLDBA, kce May 29 '13 at 16:28

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

4 Answers

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Listed in no particular order. These are the antivirus applications I know that run on Linux.

  1. Sophos
  2. Trend Micro Server Project
  3. RAV Antivirus
  4. Vexira Antivirus
  5. Panda Antivirus
  6. AVG Antivirus
  7. Avira Antivir

Also check Open Antivirus.

share|improve this answer
3  
With the exception of Open Antivirus, they are not free software / open source, though. –  flight May 29 '09 at 14:24
add comment

You have the solution from Avira (Antivir), a free edition is available for Linux : http://www.free-av.com/en/download/download_servers.php

share|improve this answer
add comment

I use fprot on linux:

F-PROT Antivirus for Linux Workstations is FREE for use by personal users on personal workstations

share|improve this answer
add comment

If you want an antivirus that's probably because you want to protect a closed-source, non-free operating system. Then why want a free antivirus?

share|improve this answer
4  
Running an open-source system or operating system does not mean in any way that your devoid of the possibility of malicious code being executed on that system. While generally you don't see as many as the close-source counterparts, it is still very well possible... –  Jason Mock May 29 '09 at 12:55
    
@Jason: Anti-virus protect against viruses, not against "malicious code" as a whole. AVs can't do squat against worms, unpatched systems, default passwords, trojan horses and so on. They protect against viruses. Period. There is no virus problem on Linux (even though there has been POCs otherwise). It's a fact. The reason is simple: RPM/DEB. Antivirus have their vulnerabilities, and they have happened and been exploited much more often than viruses on Linux, which is why you should not install one if you don't need it. –  niXar May 29 '09 at 16:17
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.