Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

New to servers, been hovering on for some days. Most of the architectures there show that people are using squid for proxy. Apache also provided mod_proxy which to a noob eye seems pretty much the same. Is there a perticular reason to opt for squid instead of mod_proxy?


share|improve this question
Not so much an answer, but see as well. – McJeff Jun 14 '10 at 14:05
up vote 1 down vote accepted

it's the same, but with a lot better suited architecture.

since you don't run applications on Squid, all code is reviewed with the same goal: serve from cache, or get out of the way.

also, it's event-driven, and single-threaded; giving the best performance / resource utilization ratios.

of course, there's also Varnish and Nginx.... both claim to be even better (i'm really impressed by Nginx)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.