Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have no idea why the following TLD have a MX record on the root level of the zone. This does not make sense at all.

Does this show the technical incompetence of the NIC? Please comment If I'm wrong.

(At least Postfix looks not to be able to send to postmaster@ai because it automatically appends localdomain.)

Test it yourself with "dig mx ai" for example.

.AI   =>   mail.offshore.AI.
.AS   =>   dca.relay.gdns.net.
.BJ   =>   mail6.domain-mail.com.
.CF   =>   mail.intnet.CF.
.DJ   =>   smtp.intnet.DJ.
      =>   relais2.intnet.DJ.
.DM   =>   mail.nic.DM.
.GP   =>   ns1.nic.GP.
      =>   ns34259.ovh.net.
      =>   manta.outremer.com.
.HR   =>   alpha.carnet.HR.
.IO   =>   mailer2.IO.
.KH   =>   ns1.dns.net.KH.
.KM   =>   mail1.comorestelecom.KM.
.MH   =>   imap.pwke.twtelecom.net.
.MQ   =>   mx1-mq.mediaserv.net.
.NE   =>   bow.rain.fr.
      =>   bow.intnet.NE.
.PA   =>   ns.PA.
.TD   =>   mail.intnet.TD.
.TT   =>   66-27-54-142.san.rr.com.
      =>   66-27-54-138.san.rr.com.
.UA   =>   mr.kolo.net.
.VA   =>   proxy2.urbe.it.
      =>   john.vatican.VA.
      =>   paul.vatican.VA.
      =>   lists.vatican.VA.
.WS   =>   mail.worldsite.WS.
.TD   =>   mail.intnet.TD
.YE   =>   mail.yemen.net.YE.
share|improve this question
    
you should further edit the question by making an actual question and avoiding calling incompetent people. You should also point to some reference that mandates that TLDs shouldn't have MX records. –  anddam Apr 8 '13 at 6:56

3 Answers 3

It's perfectly legal - it means the zone operator can just use <address>@<cctld> for their NIC operations. Any software that doesn't support it is broken- search path resolution should only be attempted once an initial DNS lookup has failed.

Note that your nomenclature isn't quite correct - these records exist at the apex of the zone. There's only one root, and it's the one at the top of the tree.

share|improve this answer
    
Don't split hairs. There is no real sense in doing it or using it. Thats why only some uncommon regional NIC have this kind of weird setup and nobody of them is known for providing a reliable nic service, or are they? hell, most of the MX for .GP are not even reachable/providing smtp service. –  Roland Jun 29 '10 at 15:34
    
and your basis and credentials for impugning the reputations of the admins of those ccTLDs are what exactly? –  Alnitak Jul 1 '10 at 13:01

You can send the mail to "postmaster@ai." and it should get there (I don't run Postfix, but if it can't handle that address it's a shortcoming of Postfix, not the DNS system).

share|improve this answer

It is valid, though as you pointed out, some e-mail applications and servers will not take kindly to an e-mail address formatted like that.

share|improve this answer
    
But why do you want it anyway? As a NIC? –  Roland Jun 25 '10 at 23:56
1  
You would have to ask them. Perhaps they just want to cover all the bases for receiving mail from potential customers? –  Justin Scott Jun 28 '10 at 13:26

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.