I am setting up my server lab, can you please recommend an affordable and very reliable router than can handle over 100,000 simultaneous open tcp connections without breaking a sweat?
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jul 20 '10 at 7:24
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
closed as too localized by Skyhawk, Mark Henderson♦ Dec 1 '11 at 4:41
This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
When you say "handle over 100,000 simultaneous open tcp connections", what do you actually mean? A router that is capable of having that number of TCP connections flowing through it? That can handle that number of TCP connections terminating on it (SSH or telnet sessions to it, web requests to the built-in web server, FTP connections to the built-in FTP server)? That can sensibly do flow-based decisions on 100k+ flows?
If it's "just" TCP sessions flowing through it and being routed, what's the expected number of packets per second for each flow? If you're looking at ~10 pps per session, you're looking at (at least) 1 Mpps through the router.
According to this document:
So, depending on what you mean by "handle 100k TCP sessions", it looks like the 7200 is towards the lower end of what you want.