Why does this answer tell me it is impossible, and this one states the opposite?


Update1:

link|improve this question

42% accept rate
The answer to the second question has nothing to do with runas. The answer relates to how IE does authentication. – Zoredache Aug 25 '10 at 18:10
Which is the second question? If it is [2], then it tells also about SSMS. They are just exactly 2 and only cases (IE, SSMS) that I, as developer, need, i.e. to runas under domain user from non-domained computer – WebMAOhist Aug 25 '10 at 18:24
@Zoredache, see Update1. It is difficult for me to understand that using/entering RunAs has nothing to do with RunAs. What do you mean by this? – WebMAOhist Aug 26 '10 at 1:08
feedback

closed as not a real question by GregD, Zypher, Warner, Chris S, Izzy Aug 25 '10 at 19:17

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

In the 2nd link, the use of runas with the /netonly switch tells runas to run the specified program and if the program is ever asked for remote authentication to use the supplied credentials. The program is still executed as a local user.

The 1st link has the questioner attempting to actually run the program as a domain user, which will not work(link).

link|improve this answer
feedback

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.