Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

People say that Windows 2000 has reached its end of support period. Bug fixes/security patches will not be issued even if there are. So, for this reason, I think we shouldn't use Windows 2000 at corporate/enterprise environments. Do you agree or not?

share|improve this question

There's no 'people say that' here; It has reached its end of life. This is clearly documented on the Microsoft website.

If I had windows 2000 deployed and it was still doing everything the business needed then I'd want to upgrade, but if its a big deployment and funding an upgrade is a problem then you have to be realistic. I'd also say that being realistic goes both ways, the business would need to understand that new server hardware will very likely not support Windows 2000, that security will be an issue where patches are not produced, and the 'latest and greatest' applications from both Microsoft and third parties are going to expect to be working with a newer version of Windows / AD.

There's no way in hell I'd start a new deployment with anything less than the latest OS, for the reasons mentioned above.

share|improve this answer
+1 Good answer. I'd just like to add that it's reasonable to use a virtual environment to run an older OS on new hardware. It was very effective for me when I couldn't run Windows SBS 2003 on the metal, but it ran magnificently inside VMWare. – user3914 Oct 28 '10 at 7:02

Bug fixes and patches is not the only reason to remove Win2k systems from production.

Efficient Admins will create new tools using the most practical method. Most of these new methods are not available on the old server, therefore you have to either support two lines of tools, or manage the new servers with outdated tools - both situations cost a lot of time.

Let´s look at Powershell: It can be made to somewhat work, but not fully. For instance, the wonderful set-owner tool doesnt work on win2k.

Having to haul around a Win2k Server is a burden. Migrate it.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.