Need help choosing between these two servers regarding to their performance:
First one, Intel Xeon 3460 with 16 GB DDR3. Second one, Inter Xeon 5620 (Only one CPU) with 12 GIG/ECC Registerd. Both run on RAID10 SATA.
closed as too localized by Mark Henderson♦ Jul 30 '12 at 0:11
This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
The main features of these are:
Xeon 3460: Nehalem (Lynnfield 45nm architecture) -4 cores 2.8Ghz Hyperthreading, 1Meg/8Meg L2/L3 cache, two memory controllers capable of running at up to 1333Mhz. IO is DMI @ 2.5GT/sec, TurboBoost is 1/1/4/5.
Xeon 5620 (Gulftown 32nm architecture) - 4 cores 2.2Ghz Hyperthreading, 1Meg/12Meg L2/L3 cache, three memory controllers capable of running at up to 1066Mhz. IO is 2x QPI @ 5.86 GT/sec, TurboBoost is 1/1/2/2.
These feature-sets are too close to make any sensible recommendation between them without knowing the workload. The Lynnfield can use TurboBoost to scale up a single core to 3.4Ghz vs a peak of about 2.4Ghz for the Gulftown and the raw CPU speed difference in this example is high enough that even with the latter's improved architecture I would expect the Lynnfield to outperform for workloads that are specifically CPU bound. Ideally though you should try benchmarking if it matters a lot as per Khaled's comment. There are other important details such as speed of the RAM you are choosing between and how important IO performance is that may make a bigger difference than the CPU speed.