Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am building a Windows 2008 R2 server which will host both Microsoft SQL databases and websites on IIS. Most likely a Dell R710.

I want to go with a RAID 10 for a mix of security and speed. I don't think I'm going to need too much space (databases are mostly text based, will be 1 GB or so at most).

Price-wise I can either choose 6 x 146 GB 15K RPM or 4 x 300 GB 15K RPM hard drives, there is barely any difference in price. The 4 x 300 obviously gives me a bit more space, but that space is most likely going to be unused anyways.

Therefore my question - should I go with the 6x146 or the 4x300 configuration? Are there any benefits to go for more smaller drives? If so, how significant are they?

Thanks!

share|improve this question
    
No common benefit to smaller drives; there are benefits to more drives under the right conditions. –  Chris S Dec 8 '10 at 13:40
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

Agreed with Tom in the first sense.

6x146GB of 15K RPM will give some nice IOPS, though. You'd have three axles of RAID 1 in a larger RAID 0 array, giving you three times the speed of a single drive for writes, and up to six for reads.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 (Assuming the disk controller can keep up... don't cheap out in the wrong places) –  Chris S Dec 8 '10 at 13:38
    
Agreed :) Disk controllers can add a bit more speed via a battery-backed cache, but they can also slow down the whole array. –  Jeff McJunkin Dec 8 '10 at 15:31
add comment

The smaller dirve will give you a lot more IO budget. OTOH you may not need it. That simple,. According to your specs I would not even go with 4x150 but with 2. That naturally said only for the case that your assumptions about waht the server does are correct in the first place.

share|improve this answer
add comment

A DB so small should fit in cache, making HDD speed irrelevant.

share|improve this answer
    
yes, because write IO doesn't matter when you've cached everything.... –  gbjbaanb Dec 8 '10 at 11:41
    
I'd let it fly if you said "less important", but not "irrelevant". –  Chris S Dec 8 '10 at 13:39
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.