Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We currently have approximately 50 users in an Exchange 2003 environment. We have about 25 users who get email via iPhone or other smart-phone. Currently, we are pushing the Exchange database cap (70 of 75 gig).

We are considering the pro version of Zimbra. Given this environment, what would you recommend?

share|improve this question
    
possible duplicate of Exchange server replacement that runs on Linux –  Ben Pilbrow Dec 16 '10 at 18:30

4 Answers 4

up vote 0 down vote accepted

It's rather difficult to make suggestions without knowing a lot more about the context and constraints.

The way software is provided for Unix/Linux is usually quite different from the way Microsoft package solutions, particularly for messaging applications. Most people I know would build (have built) their own solution out of standard components e.g. postfix or sendmail for the MTA, various milters, ClamAv for virus checking etc, probably procmail for the MDA and courier or dovecot for the IMAP/POP server, squirrelmail for web access. (NB there are many other very good products which could be used in place of those I've mentioned).

However if you don't have strong Unix skills, then a pre-packaged commercial offering with a support package will often be a more cost-effective solution (Zimbra is exactly that - a bundle of free products and a bit of glue - you pay for the support - not for the software). The fact that you think of Zimbra and MSExchange as mail servers rather implies that you do not currently have the skills to build your own solution.

You could do a lot worse than Zimbra, but do have a look at Scalix and SME server

share|improve this answer
    
There are some features in the Network Edition that aren't in the Community edition of Zimbra. Most notably support for mobile devices (push email, contacts, calendaring, remote wipe, and policy enforcement). And built in backup and restore tools. –  3dinfluence Dec 16 '10 at 18:08
    
I forgot to mention Kolab - but I've not looked at it for some time –  symcbean Dec 20 '10 at 9:08

Rather than give up and change your windows network to a Linux network becuase your nearly reaching the database limit. (thats how i took your question I appologies if i'm wrong) I wonder how much research you have done into see why your nearing the database limit?
I think for only 50 users to be using nearly 75GB of data, your either doing something wrong or users are sending/recieving massive emails whilst keeping them in their mailbox!

  1. Is Mailbox Management setup to run? Has it ever run?
  2. Do you have Archieves setup for your users? (AutoArchive?)
  3. Have you run an offline defrag of your Exchange database?
  4. What is your deleted items retention set at?

I think you will find it hard to find a linux based mirror of your Exchange solution, if not impossible (unless you excel in nix based OS)

If you have any questions let me know, I am happy to help you where I can.

UPDATE

I have just re-read your question, I assumed you are using SBS2003. Could you please confirm your Server OS?
If you are not using SBS2003 you should be able to add another mailbox store and migrate your heavy users over to it.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for managing mailboxes. I have half a dozen clients running SBS 2003 (and some now on SBS 2008) and have never had a problem with InfoStore size: they max out the CALs before that ever happens. Are you seeing alot of spam that's going undeleted? Attachment size restrictions too lax? –  gravyface Dec 16 '10 at 16:15
    
The server is Windows 2003 Standard Edition. The exchange limit is not the only consideration for the switch -- just the catalyst. –  David Hamilton Dec 19 '10 at 17:15
    
In terms of your Exchange, I'm quite sure you would be able to create an additional mailbox store to load balance your heavy users. - Are there any other considerations we could possibly help you with? –  JamesK Dec 20 '10 at 9:07

If you are still considering between Windows and Linux for 50 users ... I would suggest go for SBS (Small Business Server option bundled with a Dell Server) That will give you Exchange 2007 and will be very easy to manage.

Zimbra is good (Am not sure of the cost comparison between zimbra and exchange)

Your skills in Linux, Zimbra, SMTP, MTA etc will be the deciding factor here.

share|improve this answer

I've been running Zimbra Network Edition now for 2.5 years in a small business with about 50 mail boxes. It's not without it's warts but over all it's a very good solution and we've been happy with it.

Now that VMWare owns it they do offer it as a virtual appliance. But you can also install it on Ubuntu Server 8.04 LTS which is a free supported platform. Support for 10.04 LTS is currently marked as beta, what ever that means, but I would expect that will be a fully supported platform once Zimbra 6 is released.

But setting up a Linux system to run Zimbra isn't too difficult. The Zimbra installer contains all the pieces and their dependencies so the only think you really need to do at the Linux level is setup and secure SSH and if you wish setup iptables firewall to only allow the traffic you wish. You can use UFW if you're using Ubuntu.

Cost wise a 50 mailbox license of the Network Edition will run you $1500 a year.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.