Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does the Network neutrality ruleing mean that you can lawfully host a server on ANY ISP without paying extra?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by GregD, jscott, RobM, Scott Pack, Helvick Dec 22 '10 at 15:00

Questions on Server Fault are expected to relate to server, networking, or related infrastructure administration within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

It's ill-advised to take legal advice from complete strangers... – GregD Dec 22 '10 at 14:54
Where should this question go if it doesn't go here? – James T Dec 22 '10 at 15:02
You should hire a lawyer and ask him or her. – GregD Dec 22 '10 at 15:03
Generally the answer is no. How your ISP handles data coming to an from your endpoint falls squarely under the contract that governs your connection (ToS or similar). Net neutrality is the idea that your ISP should not handle the data differently depend on where the other end of the connection is, or what kind of data is being transported. – Chris S Dec 22 '10 at 15:11
up vote 0 down vote accepted

No. It does not mean you have to get a symmetric line. And end user connections are noramlyl slow on upload.

Yes. Like now, every ISP which offers hosting will offer you hosting.

share|improve this answer
So any isp that didnt allow, still doesnt allow, and any isp that does allow, still allows? So confusing. – James T Dec 22 '10 at 14:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.