Sign up ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For a relatively large network (thousands of hosts) - what are the arguments for and against running a locally managed (pool of) NTP server(s) (perhaps periodically set via some public NTP server) and having all other hosts on the network use that (pool of) NTP server(s) versus having all hosts simply use public NTP servers directly, say via

Aside from the pros and cons, What is typical best practice today?

share|improve this question
homework question? Seems like a network admin for a network with thousands of hosts would already be using NTP. – JamesBarnett Jan 13 '11 at 3:15
The question isn't whether to use NTP, it's whether to stand up your own NTP or use public ones. – Ian Varley Jan 13 '11 at 15:05
Hah, it's been a long time since I've had any homework :) I'm not a personally a network admin with thousands of hosts - but the question came up and I'm interested in the existing best practices. – BeeOnRope Jan 18 '11 at 4:34

7 Answers 7

up vote 10 down vote accepted

The best practice is to run your own pool of NTP servers set to sync from public NTP servers. In the event that your organization was to lose internet access, you would not want your clocks to become skewed. Further, it is rude to set thousands of hosts to public servers when you could (and should) operate a mirror.

Finally, if you have a secure computing requirement, then you should operate your own independent NTP hosts. You would require special hardware for these systems to operate.

EDIT: Since there was discussion of it, here is some hardware:

Any hardware supporting PPS seems to work on a modern ntpd. This includes some GPS units, although this seems to be rare, at least as rare as serial GPS units are these days. There are hardware devices sold explicitly for this function, however, including one product called TSync-PCIe. According to the manufacturer's site:

The TSync-PCIe offers several configurations of a synchronized timecode reader/generator package offering flexibility and easy integration of precise timing into an embedded computing application. Choose from synchronization to IRIG (and other similar timecodes), GPS (internal or external receivers), or Precise Time Protocol (PTP/IEEE-1588v2). - Site Link:

share|improve this answer
+1 for mentioning the hardware clock. There's directions around the net for hooking up a cheap Garmin 18 LVC to a Linux box to make your own Stratum 0 source. – Chris S Jan 13 '11 at 1:28
Although all those instructions seem to involve doing your own hardware hacking to build an interface. – Phil Hollenback Jan 13 '11 at 3:58
@Phil, people looking for a cheap GPS stratum 0 source are probably willing to do a bit of hardware hacking. If you want something easy, fork out the cash for it like everyone else. – Chris S Jan 13 '11 at 4:40
Yeah it just seems a pretty simple task to get a timecode from a gps device so I would naively assume it would be a simple connection. – Phil Hollenback Jan 13 '11 at 9:12

Even on a small network I use a local NTP service, which itself updates from an external one. One reason is purely historical, dating back to when the only connection to the Internet was via dial-up modems. The other is that if the NTP service is wrong for any reason I would prefer all the machines to still be consistent, which is more likely to be the case if they all update from a single source.

share|improve this answer
This is the way of it imho. While having the 'correct' time is definitely a good thing, it can actually be more important for devices on a LAN to have a consistent time between them even if its different from the correct time. Things like Kerberos authentication will fail if time isn't in sync between servers and clients, and consistent time might be important for things like log monitoring, CCTV records (e.g. camera and PVR both will add a timestamp), etc. – RobM Jan 17 '11 at 11:28

Best practice, setup 2 (or more) NTP hosts at your location, peer them. Have them sync against at least 4 (preferably, up to 8) external servers from to If you use more than 4 you should adjust the frequency that they poll the pool members.

Here's an edited version of my ntp.conf:

server minpoll 8 maxpoll 14
server minpoll 8 maxpoll 14
server minpoll 8 maxpoll 14
server minpoll 8 maxpoll 14


driftfile /var/db/drift.ntp
logfile /var/log/ntp.log
logconfig +sysall +syncall

You can omit the minpoll and maxpoll arguments, I add them so I'm a bit lighter on those servers. The values are 2^n seconds, where n is the argument; those values are higher than the defaults (6 & 10) because I already poll 12 different servers between my three NTP hosts.

If you're very concerned with accuracy you might add the following as well:

server prefer minpoll 10 maxpoll 16

This will poll the navy's atomic clock. Note the high poll times as they're fairly heavily loaded and have requested people take it easy on their server (actually a 3 node cluster).

share|improve this answer
What happens with this if the external NTP servers are out of sync? – Warren Dew Aug 11 '14 at 16:37
1. That doesn't happen or at least not on a scale that matters. 2. It depends on what exactly is "out of sync" and by how much. If a single external server is way off it will not be used. The chances of all 4 being off by a crazy amount is astronomically small. If you're concerned with accuracy, use the USNO server cluster, it's low jitter will make it's time preferable. – Chris S Aug 11 '14 at 17:45

As others have mentioned, for thousands of internal hosts, providing your own time servers is the way to go. For reasons such as (as other already mentioned):

  • structure: configure time setup as you choose; with as many as 1 stratum sources as possible
  • robustness: configure ntp system to be robust as needed; using own clock sources (GPS) and/or NTP sources with different routes
  • politeness: kind consideration for hosting organization of external time sources; less load for them
  • performance: limiting external NTP network traffic to a few hosts (minor issue)
  • security: limiting NTP network traffic externally to a few hardened hosts

As far as best practices:

From, here is a recommended structure for NTP only sources.

 1a  1b     1c  1d     1e  1f      outside
. \ / ...... \ / ...... \ / ..............
   2a ---p--- 2b ---p--- 2c        inside
  /|\        /|\        /|\
 / | \      / | \      / | \
3a 3b 3c   3e 3f 3g   3h 3i 3j

Key: 1 = stratum-1, 2 = stratum-2, 3 = stratum-3, p = peer

This page also lists how to setup NTP servers.

Additional information for setting up an NTP server is from . Examples being:

  • Setup about 5 servers
  • Use the standard ntpd
  • Don't use the LOCAL clock driver
  • use NTP time sources that are geographically/network closest to you and low stratum numbers
share|improve this answer

I think most large networks use a small pool of dedicated internal ntp servers. ntp traffic is pretty light so you probably don't need many servers to serve a large organization.

As with all network services, the advantage of running your own ntp servers is you get more control and get to make more decisions. For example, if you lose network connectivity to the outside world, your machines can continue to talk to your internal ntp server and you don't have to worry about them all having to reconnect to external servers.

If you have thousands of servers you should also consider running your own dedicated time server, for example off a gps device or via a dedicated atomic clock. I'm not sure how much that costs these days but it can't be expensive relative to the thousands of systems you are already supporting.. Then you have an accurate time service completely independent of your connection to the outside world.

Another point to consider is that running your own ntp servers is more polite. That way you have just a few machines making external requests as opposed to thousands. I'm sure the admins of the publicly accessible ntp servers out there would appreciate that. Plus it will reduce your external network traffic slightly (very slightly) which is probably a good thing.

Also if you run your own ntp servers you can tighten up your firewall a little bit since just a few machines are connecting to the outside on port 123 instead of lots of machines. That might be useful.

ntp is easy to set up and once you have it running it requires very little maintenance. Every company I've ever been involved with has set up it's own ntp servers and that has worked just fine.

share|improve this answer

A good reason for running your own NTP server(s) in a large network is making sure all your machines agree on the correct time. Having lots of systems with their own settings for external time servers (or all using different members) can lead to small differences in time on systems which may lead to problems.

The other good reason is that having your own NTP server(s) means synchronized time will stay available from a few (monitored!) servers when the outside link goes down or is saturated with traffic.

All my opinion as a timegeek.

share|improve this answer

Best practice in that case would be running your own NTP server - or a pool as necessary - and pulling from the NTP pool nearest you geographically. This reduces the load that the public facing NTP servers have to bear but will still give you a high amount of accuracy. If you require even more accuracy, you could pull from the Stratum 1 servers, but doing so increases the load that the pool has to bear, so you should only do this if you are willing to contribute a server to the pool.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.