I'm graduating soon with a Bachelors of Science in CIT and I was wondering if it's worth the trouble of going to Graduate school or not. It doesn't seem like it's really necessary so I'd like to hear your thoughts on the matter.
|
feedback
|
|
No, a masters is not required. My suggestion would be to go out and get some real world experience. Then, if you REALLY want to do it later go for it. If you want to move into positions that require it go for it. If your company will pay for it, and it will help your career path go for it. | |||||||||||
feedback
|
|
IMHO: A "Network Administrator" does not need a masters to get a job. I have a masters, and I did it right after my undergrad. Here was my thinking at the time:
It turned out to be a very nice two years. I took much harder classes that I never had time for before and I TA'd a networking course, which helped me internalize lots of networking fundamentals that I had only lightly covered. That said, I did spend a few days each year teaching BGP. And BGP in the classroom is nothing like BGP in the real world. So when I got my first job at an ISP they wouldn't even let me touch the BGP configs. (rightly so) So do the Masters if you like school and want to avoid "the real world" a bit. It may not pay off, but it's a great learning experience. I'm glad I did it. There are often times now a days when I wish I had the freedom to just 'study'. Several other posts discussed going back for a masters. There's no way I would have returned to school after getting out. The quality of life that a paycheck brings makes it VERY hard to go back to student life. | |||||
feedback
|
|
Experience, experience, experience. I couldn't care less if you have a Master's or an Associate's degree.* *Coming from someone in a position to hire, but I'm not the Google. | |||
feedback
|
|
It's possible you might save a couple of years on the IT career-ladder, but at this stage in the game real-world-experience with actual products in actual environments will earn you better resume-polish. Once you have a few years under your belt, then you can opt for graduate-school. Some hiring managers like their middle-career people to have degrees, others don't give a wet fig. Though it's hard to predict the future, Tech has historically been an experience-driven career-path. That said, the graduate degree you get in a few years may not be Manager of Information Technology, it may be an MBA. Business-smarts matter quite a bit once you get to a certain level. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
No. If you are just graduating with your B.S. degree, real-world experience is far more important. If you really want to invest more time and energy in your education, you are far better off getting professional-level industry certifications that have knowledge requirements but not experience requirements. What if I were hiring a network administrator and I had to choose between two candidates, one with a master's degree and one with an MCITP plus a CCNP? All else being equal, I certainly would find the certifications more compelling. | |||||||
feedback
|
|
I suspect people with masters degrees will tell you it is important, and people without them will tell you it is not. I have a bachelors degree in computer science and it has served me well. When I was younger (I'm 37) I did think about going back to school for an advanced degree, but never seriously pursued it. I've had a successful career so far with a bachelors. Keep in mind that most studies indicate that the financial return of a masters degree may be worthwhile, but PhDs are a losing proposition. My vote is for at least a bachelors degree in computer science, so you have a solid theoretical foundation. After that, don't worry about it. | |||||||
feedback
|