Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

May I use CDN for whole website (PHP, Apache, MySQL) or just for images and CSS, JS files?

What's the best choice > cloud-hosting or dedicated-hosting? Does CDN has that support?

Witch hosting you suggest me the best - the fastest, stablest 100% uptime, CDN, not expensive at all?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

You've got three questions in one here, so let's take them in the order you asked:

  1. Typically, you would use a CDN for serving static assets such as Images/CSS/JS.
  2. CDN and Cloud/Static are not the same thing. With CDN, you provide the CDN your assets and they take care of the rest. Cloud/Static are used for dynamic content and you would configure things yourself.
  3. It all depends on your requirements and application. There's really no such thing as 100% uptime, it just won't happen. You can, however, come very close. I would recommend Amazon, their Cloudfront offering is downright cheap and their new Free Tier for EC2 (cloud servers) is hard to pass up...
share|improve this answer
1  
Thanks for your post! Could you suggest me to use rackspace.com or mediatemple.net hosting services? –  Binyamin Jan 17 '11 at 17:03
1  
I would go with Rackspace. I've had a very positive experience with them. Oh, and if my response answered your question, please do me a favor and click the checkmark next to my original response. Thanks! –  BenGC Jan 17 '11 at 19:29
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.