Say you're running a server and you don't want to upgrade to Testing (Squeeze) from Stable (Lenny) to just install a required package or two.
What's the best way of installing only certain packages from Testing?
|
Say you're running a server and you don't want to upgrade to Testing (Squeeze) from Stable (Lenny) to just install a required package or two. What's the best way of installing only certain packages from Testing?
| ||||
|
feedback
|
|
answer no longer applies to the latest debians; please see another answers in /etc/apt/apt.conf add
in /etc/apt/sources.list - add urls for testing / unstable sources run
and then install what you need with
be very very carefull if you install stuff that has plenty of dependencies.. preferebly dont do this on production. you can as well try your luck at backports or similar repository | |||||||||||||||||
feedback
|
|
apt_preferences Define the default level that the system should 'safe-upgrade' to in the /etc/apt/preferences file: There's a lot you can do with apt_preferences but for the sake of simplicity... I needed to install a single package (autoMysqlBackup) that was only available in Testing. The solution was to add the following to /etc/apt/preferences:
With multiple repositories added to /etc/apt/sources.list aptitude will now only upgrade to your specified release even though the later release repos are listed (in this case 'stable').
So to install that package, all you have to do is:
| |||||||||||||
feedback
|
|
The debian documentation is extensive in the subject and I strongly advise to dig in as it will truely unveil the beauty of the debian system. Have a look at How to keep a mixed system, it will explain all you need tio know. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
For what it's worth, the general advice I've always seen is "Don't mix stable with anything." Most of the mixed systems tutorials are for mixing testing and unstable. The reasoning seems to be that if you mix stable with testing, very basic packages (like libc6) will require updates (in order to install software from testing), and once these basic packages move to testing, the whole system can drift that way. Here are two alternatives:
| |||
|
feedback
|
|
Many people seem to be afraid of mixing stable with testing, but frankly, testing is fairly stable in its own right, and with proper preferences and solution checking, you can avoid the "stability drift" that puts your core packages on the unstable path. "Testing is fairly stable??", you ask. Yes. In order for a package to migrate from unstable to testing, it has to have zero open bugs for 10 consecutive days. Chances are that, especially for the more popular packages, somebody is going to submit a bug report for an unstable version if something is wrong. Even if you don't want to mix the environments, it's still nice to have the option there in case you run into some thing that requires a newer version than what is in stable. Here's what I recommend for setting this up: First, create the following files in
(Don't be afraid of the unstable/experimental stuff here. The priorities are low enough that it's never going to automatically install any of that stuff. Even the testing branch will behave, as it's only going to install the packages you want to be in testing.) Now, creating a matching set for
You can replace the steadfast.net mirror with whatever you want. I'd recommend using You can also add a To install the testing version of a package, simply use If you get complaints of package conflicts, look at the solutions first. In most cases, the first one is going to be "don't install this version". Learn to use the per-package accept/reject resolver choices. For example, if you're installing foobar-package/testing, and the first solution is "don't install foobar-package/testing", then mark that choice as rejected, and the other solutions will never veer to that path again. In cases like these, you'll probably have to install a few other testing packages. If it's getting too hairy (like it's trying to upgrade libc or the kernel or some other huge core system), then you can either reject those upgrade paths or just back out of the initial upgrade altogether. Remember that it's only going to upgrade stuff to testing/unstable if you allow it to. | |||
|
feedback
|