IPv4 can broadcast. Why can't IPv6 do that?
|
feedback
|
|
IPv6 does not implement traditional IP broadcast, and therefore does not define broadcast addresses. In IPv6, the same result can be achieved by sending a packet to the link-local all nodes multicast group which is analogous to IPv4 multicast. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
As it's explained incredibly well, I prefer to cut&paste the answer. This is from "The TCP/IP Guide", a must read:
| ||||
|
feedback
|
|
In IPv4 "broadcasts" are really just sent to everyone on the local broadcast domain, which is a finite domain. Multicast is sent to a finite domain defined by a particular group. See how IPv4 'broadcasts' are just a particular subset of multicast (where the 'group' is everyone). In IPv6 they eliminated the redundant term. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
A broadcast assumes that everyone is interested in your packet, and all hosts need to process it. For embedded devices, it is highly unlikely that they will be able to handle the request, and thus it is usually better if they can stay in power-save mode. Using multicast instead of broadcast allows the network interface to determine in hardware whether the packet is interesting enough to warrant waking up the main processor, which significantly increases battery lifetime for these devices. | |||
|
feedback
|