Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We are looking for a decent hosting provider for our Flash widget (several SWF files) The widget is quite popular. The download traffic is 4TB per month and it is growing.

CPU/Memory just do not matter.

Can you recommend a decent hosting for our case?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by Jason Berg, Iain, Scott Pack, DanBig, Ben Pilbrow Feb 4 '11 at 18:01

Questions on Server Fault are expected to relate to professional server, networking, or related infrastructure administration within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1 Answer 1

If you are just hosting files I would use Amazon S3 (http://aws.amazon.com/s3/) and Amazon Cloudfront (http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/). Its ridiculously easy to use and you only pay for what you consume.

share|improve this answer
    
As far as I see Amazon S3 is very expensive as well as Amazon Cloudfront. It costs $100/1TB/Month At the moment we pay $100/month/4TB at Superb Hosting –  par Feb 4 '11 at 16:21
    
Why not stick with them, then? If they're decent and cheap, awesome. If you want to move because they're not decent, maybe that's why the decent hosts are more expensive. –  ceejayoz Feb 9 '11 at 17:39

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.