Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Consider a network of two PCs, PC1 and PC2, connected to each other through a router. Note that the network is symmetrically disposed to PC1 and PC2. Once booted, the PC's run ospfd (over Quagga) and the router run OSPF. After giving sufficient time (maybe an hour) for the OSPF to converge, can I expect PC1 and PC2 to have symmetrical routing tables (i.e. one contains PC2 in place of the other's PC1 entry)?

More generally, suppose I have a large network of many hosts, divided into several subnets, interconnected through routers, all running OSPF. If there are 2 hosts or routers placed symmetrically in the network, will they have symmetrical routing tables once OSPF converges?

share|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

PCs would not run OSPF in the first place; only routers use it. If all three were routers, they would all be aware of each others routes, but they would not necessarily be symmetric (though it's possible, many factors could make the routing tables asymmetric).

share|improve this answer
I meant "ospfd", using Quagga. I've fixed this. – Ganesh Apr 16 '11 at 19:26

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.