Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I plan to make an HyperV server with 5 or 6 vms, here is the hardware :

Xeon L3426 4core 8 thread
16 go ram
2*2To HDD
Dell H200 Raid Controller (RAID 0 OR 1);

and VMs contains that :

4 vms are windows server 2008 r2 
1 : font end TMG 2010, 
2 : AD DC, 
3 : SHarepoint 2010 +  SQL SEVER 2008 (analyse, report , integration),
4 : TFS 2010

2 vms are debian (apache + tomcat + mysql)

i want to know whats the best raid mode to have better access performance

3) SOFT RAID 0 on 50% of each HDD
4) NO RAID But i would put 3 vms on each HDD (backup on the other disk)
share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let's go through your options;

  1. Hardware R0 - could be faster but if you lose a disk you lose all your data.
  2. Hardware R1 - plenty fast enough but you can lose either disk and carry on just fine, replacing the lost disk later for full resilience.
  3. Software 0 - just as risky as hardware R0 but with added CPU and IO overhead.
  4. No RAID - no less risky that hardware R1 but more complex and with no auto-failover mechanism built in.

Go with option 2) Hardware RAID 1, no question, it's the only way.

share|improve this answer
why that ? security ? but if i mirror backup with 2 disk ? (no raid).... with separate disk can i get better performance than 1 raid 1 ? – Bgnt44 May 7 '11 at 12:47
No, I've added some extra detail, see above. – Chopper3 May 7 '11 at 13:13
ok thanks , i'll follow your advice, until i got 4 disk – Bgnt44 May 9 '11 at 14:32

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.