Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Following discussions triggered on another question: let's imagine a small start-up company who has to decide what to do with its capital. Two suggestions are made:

a) The company spends capital on a good sysadmin, but takes the risk of not having enough work for him full-time (at least at the beginning). So, it is not an perfect allocation of capital.

b) One suggests to delegate sysadmin work to a 3rd party company (at least at the beginning) and spend more of the money on software engineers. It looks like better allocation of capital, but is it really? One is taking risk by not having 'control' and quality on sysadmin work. Plus can one trust a 3rd party to run servers containing critical info?

Has anyone ever attempted option b)? Was it successful or not? Was it worth it? Would you recommend it?

share

locked by HopelessN00b Jan 26 at 6:46

This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. This question and its answers are frozen and cannot be changed. More info: help center.

put on hold as primarily opinion-based by HopelessN00b Jan 26 at 6:46

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2  
I recommend Option B for any small company that doesn't want to hire someone at least part time (even then, it's probably a better idea until you can justify a full time person). Get refferences and do your homework before engaging a company; there are a lot of Less Than Qualified™ operations out there. –  Chris S May 12 '11 at 14:26

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

If you are a "tech" company, and given you mention spending on software engineers, then I assume you are, I'd recommend just getting some of your techies to help out.

Thats what we did when I started our Software developent company 11 years ago - we bought a server, put Windows Small Business Server 2000 on it and if things went wrong we fixed it.

It was running a simple mail server, firewall (for our 64K leased line!) and web proxy

Now, 11 years later I still do a lot of the sysadmin type of stuff but we also have hired a dedicated resource.

Until you are a reasonable size, a full time sysadmin is not necessary.

Of course if you are not a techie company then it makes sense to outsource to a third party.

share
    
Most developers would have a fit with someone recommending to their superior to "just have one of your techies help out." Your developer would be very ineffective at his original position if he is getting interrupted to maintain a server(s) and fix the desktops of your non-technical users. –  Puddingfox May 12 '11 at 17:05

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.