Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Our organization is reaching around a 100 email addresses (60 odd user addresses + assorted ones i.e. help@example.com, contact@example.com) along with about a dozen email groups.

Currently we are using Google Apps at $50 per email address per year. Right now thats $5,000 a year. At our current rate of growth I'm estimating we may need upto another 50 addresses. Is it worthwhile at this point to switch to an internal email solution (I.e Zimbra?) which could be hosted in an external datacenter, or is it still cost effective to use google apps.

Note we use Atlassian Confluence for our wiki system and Atlassian Crowd for SSO, so Google Apps is offering us little ROI save for the administration burden. (I'll add I am the defacto CTO and am still in process of hiring. We are getting a backend LAMP Developer first and then in six-twelve months a sys admin and network engineer).

I know there can be many debates, ideally if you answer I'm looking for a cost benefit / ROI analysis of the switch (factoring in time to administrate and other such time burdens..)

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 6 down vote accepted

My 2c - unless you're in the business of email somehow, or need the infrastructure potentially to support something else, stick with Google Apps. The administration overhead of moving to your own system without having a capable sysadmin managing it is LARGE. Spam and anti-spam measures have increased the barrier to entry of running a mail server to a large level.

FYI, I say this having worked as a sysadmin and mail server administrator (to the tune of 10's of millions of messages a day)

If email is a critical part of your business and you don't need the side benefits of running your own mailserver, Google Apps is saving you time and therefore money.

share|improve this answer
Well said. Disaster recovery is another factor to take into when building out your own email system. Google distributes their systems globally. Most shops that run their own email systems do so with 1 or 2 servers. Google Apps provides a lot of additional benefit from that perspective as well. –  Rob Jun 6 '11 at 12:59

My general rule of thumb is: If you're requirements in the near futures (<1y) are unknown and you do not have strong internal administrative staff (a SysAdmin) then outsource the need (Google Mail, Exchange Hosted, etc).

The same applies to the contrapositive: known requirements and strong admin staff, host it internally. When one or the other is there, usually stick with what you've got, but we really don't know your company as well as you do, so it's hard to make the call.

share|improve this answer

At this point, unless your email system is providing your business some impressive value-add, it's probably best to think of it as a commodity. It's going to be hard to find an ROI that is better than an outsourced solution unless you have a very compelling argument as to why you need to bring it in-house.

With the Google Apps, you have some flexibility should you change your mind down the road. But without dedicated sysadmin support and some specific value-add that you can justify in savings, I don't think you'll beat Google's price once you factor in hosting, hardware, and the opportunity cost of your sysadmin not working on revenue-producing activities because your mail server's IP is suddenly on a blacklist.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.