Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can I team two ports from the same controller?

My scenario is that I have two switches on the same network for redundancy. I want to connect each NIC Port of a dual-port server to a separate switch in case a switch dies. I want it to failover gracefully.

I believe that Switch Fault Tolerance (SFT) mode is what I should configure because it's not a bandwidth intensive application. I don't need load balancing or aggregation. I'm not too worried about the controller or server dying since we have a 'cluster' of these application servers (our application load balances itself).

I've found many articles describing teaming across separate controllers, some that imply that you can do it on the same controller. I wanted to make sure.

share|improve this question
    
Ok, thanks Chris. Now another question: according to this: intel.com/support/network/sb/cs-009747.htm you disable spanning tree on the switch ports connected to the server NIC ports, so how does it work? Is it just by nature of the link-state (up/down)? –  user713849 Jul 6 '11 at 3:02

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Yes you can.

It's worth reiterating that you will have introduced a single point of failure, if the NIC chip dies, the whole team dies. Because of this it's recommended to always have at least two separate NIC chips, though not a requirement. Clustering definitely helps, but NICs are cheap, and will failover considerably faster than clustering.

share|improve this answer
    
Sorry to be pedantic but strictly not true. By introducing another ethernet controller you are adding in redundancy. The server as supplied is a single point of failure, including the controller. –  user713849 Jul 6 '11 at 3:09
    
Apparently you haven't had a redundant component of a server fail without the "server as supplied" completely failing. You should reconsider your server's design if you can not separate a certain common component failures from a complete server or service failure. –  Chris S Jul 6 '11 at 4:08

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.