Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a bridge called "br01" in which the interfaces "eth1" and "eth0" are participating. There is a rule in the broute table of ebtables that drops RAs when they arrive in the interface eth1, so the eth1 auto-configure itself with this RA, but I want that this same RA go through the eth0 too, in order to distribute this RA to the other network which is on the eth0. Is there any way to do that ?

share|improve this question
possible duplicate of Bridge and route packet – Chris S Jul 5 '11 at 13:12
Can you show me the output of ifconfig? – bahamat Jul 9 '11 at 16:16
Your eth1 interface should not be configuring itself with the RA. The br01 interface should be the one with the addresses. – MikeyB Jul 15 '11 at 18:49

If you don't want an ebtables rule that drops the packet, why not remove that rule?

share|improve this answer
If I remove, the the packet goes to eth0 but not in the eth1, if don't remove, it goes to eth1 but not in the eth0, what I want is to have both interfaces receiving the packet. – Aldebaran Jul 9 '11 at 15:54
That's not how bridging works. Once an interface is in a bridge, it no longer functions as an independent interface. – womble Jul 9 '11 at 21:42
Yes I know, but I can do that using the target TEE for instance. So it will route the packet to eth1 and then to eth0 again by cloning the packet. But the use of TEE isn't an option in my case. – Aldebaran Jul 15 '11 at 16:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.