Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it safe to replicate from a Solaris 10 ZFS v22 to a FreeBSD 8.3 ZFS v28?

Are there someone that have done this with specific versions of ZFS, where it worked perfectly?

share|improve this question
what version of solaris are you replicating from? What is the ZFS file system version? – n8whnp Jul 30 '11 at 13:09
What do you mean with replicate ? – jlliagre Jul 30 '11 at 15:44
ZFS replication – Louise Hoffman Jul 30 '11 at 15:46
Sure but that doesn't really answer my question. It would help if you clarify what you want to duplicate (eg: a pool or a dataset), how (eg: zfs send/receive or something else), and with what constraints (eg: on-line/real time vs off-line/batch, shared or removable media). – jlliagre Jul 30 '11 at 21:05
@jlliagre : So what's what you meant. It is a pool, with one volume, and one file system. I was thinking about doing the replication with snapshots zfs send -i, so the replication is on file system level and not volume level. Would pool or volume level be better? It should be done online, but e.g. each 20 minutes or so. – Louise Hoffman Jul 30 '11 at 22:10
up vote 5 down vote accepted

There should be no issue sending a Solaris 10 ZFS v22 snapshot to a FreeBSD server supporting v28. Reciprocally, that saved snapshot, or any snapshot of a clone/descendant of the initial snapshot should be sent back to that Solaris box with no issue as long as you never upgrade the ZFS filesystem on the FreeBSD server.

What matters really are the zfs versions, not the OSes, given the fact the (Open)Solaris code base is used on both sides. Preserving upward compatibility for datasets (filesystems, volumes and snapshots) and pools is likely one of the rules that can't be broken by the ZFS developers.

Note: this somewhat happened in the past but ZFS was still beta:

Current zfs manual pages state about the zfs send stream:

       *The format of the stream is committed. You will be able to receive
       your streams on future versions of ZFS.*
share|improve this answer
No tests required ! ZFS can't corrupt data and this is by design ;) Of course, there would be many things to test anyway but that depends on what you plan to do with the file system on the each side. You should test procedures, performance, potential limitations (eg: I'm not sure FreeBSD supports sharesmb), etc. About your dataset question, I guess you are confusing terms. A pool is something built on the top of disks or similar things providing various levels of redundancy. Inside a pool you can create datasets which are file systems, volumes and snapshots. All datasets share the same pool. – jlliagre Jul 30 '11 at 23:27
A snapshot is read-only so whatever the version supported by the code mounting it, it can't be changed. If you are really talking about clones, the content might be changed but in a compatible way unless of course you upgrade. – jlliagre Jul 30 '11 at 23:40
In the above scenario, why would upgrading the FreeBSD ZFS filesystem break compatibility? Wouldn't upgrading, to say v34, still recognize the data as having come from v22, and preserve the fact? – Joe Internet Jul 31 '11 at 4:33
The machine storing the zfs stream doesn't even need to know anything about ZFS if you goal is just to be able to send it back to the original sender. However, you won't be able to restore individual files in that case. @Joe Internet, upgrading doesn't preserve the previous version. Any upgrade breaks compatibility by design. – jlliagre Jul 31 '11 at 8:16
The data is just the data. It has no version as far as ZFS is concerned. Of course, the newer system is still able to send the file data (and optionally its posix metadata) back to the original machine using a file transfer or file sharing protocol. However, we are here talking about zfs send/receive which processes more than the data and basic metadata. The file system structure is what is affected by version changes. They are bumped when one or more incompatible changes are made. – jlliagre Jul 31 '11 at 13:29

In that direction, it should work. I don't know if it would work in reverse with the FreeBSD ZFS going to the older Solaris ZFS.

share|improve this answer
I can tell for sure it won't work from a lower version to a newer. Sun have made updates to ZFS that once upgraded, you can't downgrade. What are you basing it on, that replication should work across OS'es? – Louise Hoffman Jul 30 '11 at 16:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.