Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What are the relevant pros and cons, considerations and differences between Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 while choosing an OS for running time sensitive software (not hosting web)?

What would you choose and why?

Please keep the discussion to facts and refrain from subjective opinions.

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by womble, Ward, Ben Pilbrow, Shane Madden, Chopper3 Sep 22 '11 at 14:43

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

They both share the same code base and I doubt very much the time telling ability of either differs. It's not like they're going to do if(IsClientVersion) { SkewTimeSlightly(); } else { SuperAccurateTime(); } ! – Ben Pilbrow Aug 3 '11 at 20:17
Specify "time critical". Do you mean "real time"? Then Windows is not a real time OS. In this case you need an OS designed for that purpose. RTLinux for example. And your software must also be designed for real time. So what software is it? – mailq Aug 3 '11 at 20:20
@Ben: That is not correct. Windows Server OSes do implement different scheduling algorithms than Desktop OSes. Servers prefer background processes than foreground processes. – mailq Aug 3 '11 at 20:25
@mailq That's only partly true. It's a matter of default settings, which can be changed. sysdm.cpl->advanced->(Performance)Settings...->Advanced – 84104 Aug 3 '11 at 21:28
@Jonathan - People are downvoting because, as the FAQ states, this site if for PROFESSIONAL sysadmins, and even considering using W7 in a production environment as a server is considered unprofessional by professional sysadmins. – Chopper3 Sep 22 '11 at 14:44

Windows 7 isn't a Server OS - End.

share|improve this answer
Yep. Nailed it. – MDMarra Aug 3 '11 at 20:19
oh... but Why ? – Jonathan Aug 3 '11 at 20:42
Because... it isn't. – womble Aug 4 '11 at 7:13

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.