Will adding a second SPF record mess up my DNS, or will it be like adding an extra nameserver?
(i.e. it only helps, not hurts)
|
Will adding a second SPF record mess up my DNS, or will it be like adding an extra nameserver? (i.e. it only helps, not hurts)
| ||||
|
feedback
|
|
From RFC 4408:
I'm not entirely sure what you want to achieve by adding a second record, but if it is something like adding extra hosts/networks as valid/invalid senders, you can probably do everything you want to with just the one record - just add whatever you wanted to the end of the line. | |||||
feedback
|
|
You can use this on-line SPF generator to get the appropiate TXT for SPF. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
An SPF record can include multiple domains (multiple mechanisms is the correct term), so more than one spf record will never be needed. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
In my opinion you should avoid SPF at all costs. See my answer on dkim which could be the way to go. | |||||||
feedback
|