Will adding a second SPF record mess up my DNS, or will it be like adding an extra nameserver?

(i.e. it only helps, not hurts)

link|improve this question

77% accept rate
feedback

4 Answers

up vote 14 down vote accepted

From RFC 4408:

3.1.2.  Multiple DNS Records

   A domain name MUST NOT have multiple records that would cause an
   authorization check to select more than one record.  See Section 4.5
   for the selection rules.

I'm not entirely sure what you want to achieve by adding a second record, but if it is something like adding extra hosts/networks as valid/invalid senders, you can probably do everything you want to with just the one record - just add whatever you wanted to the end of the line.

link|improve this answer
2  
+1 You should only need 1 SPF record. – KPWINC Jun 22 '09 at 15:45
feedback

You can use this on-line SPF generator to get the appropiate TXT for SPF.

link|improve this answer
feedback

An SPF record can include multiple domains (multiple mechanisms is the correct term), so more than one spf record will never be needed.

link|improve this answer
feedback

In my opinion you should avoid SPF at all costs.

See my answer on dkim which could be the way to go.

link|improve this answer
1  
I use both SPF and DKIM to ensure deliverability across all recipients. – abrahamvegh Jun 26 '09 at 17:13
You can shoot yourself in the foot. I am not sure you understand what are you talking about. If you did you would not use SPF at all. – cstamas Feb 2 '10 at 8:20
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.