Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the difference between loaded and unloaded patch panels? Is it simply that loaded patch panels come with endpoint sockets and unloaded patch panels do not?

share|improve this question

As you've surmised, a "loaded" patch panel is loaded: Connectors are pre-installed (usually all one family of connectors: e.g. the whole panel is going to be RJ45 cat6), while an unloaded patch panel is - well - not. Typically unloaded panels have empty holes (or knockouts) where connectors would go.

There are a few practical differences as a result: connectors in loaded panels are often permanently mounted, so if a port gets damaged it's dead forever. Unloaded panels let you swap out damaged/defective ports at will.
Along the same lines, you can mount a bunch of N-port unloaded panels and populate them with ports as-needed.

Some unloaded panels are also designed to allow you to mount differing connector types in the same panel (e.g. RJ45 and Fiber) in whatever proportions make sense for you. This can be an important consideration if you will be scaling up an environment...

Many telecom guys will also argue that it's easier to do cable management and scale-up with unloaded panels (where you would need to pre-wire EVERYTHING with loaded panels it's much easier to add in new ports/runs with an unloaded panel, particularly ones that allow you to install new ports from the front).

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.