Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is it possible to cross connect between different data centers? I'm looking to connect to a financial exchange and need extremely low latency. The cost for a data center 100 metres down the road is substantially less.

Is there a cost-effective way to have low latency between the 2 centers? What is the main cause of latency? The distance is negligble so I assume it must be firewalls or switches?

share|improve this question
    
What do you consider extremely low latency? And how important is it that the data must be so low in latency? If you can't afford direct fiber between the two, you're probably going to have to look at an alternative architecture to your design needs. –  Bart Silverstrim Oct 10 '11 at 10:46
    
Is it hard to get direct fiber between two datacenters? Is this a standard service. Low latency is essential for this. Not sure exact numbers at this stage or the difference between fiber and other solutions. would apprecaite any help. –  DD. Oct 10 '11 at 11:33
    
You'd want to talk to the people involved and see if you can get direct fiber. Anything that redirects through other connections will give added latency. Without knowing what kind of numbers you're looking at and need to hit, you're going to have trouble knowing if you need to change your plans for how this is constructed or if an interconnect-type plan will work. –  Bart Silverstrim Oct 10 '11 at 12:03

3 Answers 3

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I would speak the the Data Centre Operations team at one of the DC's to find out if there is existing connectivity between the two sites. If they are established data centres you will almost certainly find that there is existing ducting between the two buildings, and if you are lucky they may already be spare capacity for sale. If not it's not a massive task to blow some more fibre through the existing ducting.

Another option would be to try and find an ISP that has presence in both DC's. It would seem unlikely that in such a scenario traffic between the sites would go via a 3rd POP - and that would satisfy your latency concerns.

You'll run into problems if that ducting does not already exist though because your options will be to either go via a third POP, which would probably not meet your latency requirements, or to have someone dig up the road, which would drive the install cost through the roof.

share|improve this answer
    
What exactly is a "POP"? How much latency does this add? –  DD. Oct 10 '11 at 14:06
    
POP = point of presence - it's just a term for a place where connectivity is aggregated. You could describe it as a hub site. The latency would be introduced due to the physical distance between the sites, and the processing time on the additional routers/switches. I can't give you an accurate figure for latency by any means but I would hazard a guess that it would be in the 10 milliseconds ballpark. –  paulos Oct 10 '11 at 14:33

There really isn't given the conditions you've applied. The cheapest way to get between two data centers is wireless, however this will add a significant amount of latency (3+ms) to the connection. You can get faster wireless solutions, but in my experience that means they will need to be band licensed/microwave and the hardware for both sides will probably cost ~$20,000 and you'll have to either rent spectrum from someone or get it yourself from the FCC. The fastest way (latency wise) to connect them is to trench fiber between the two, costs will vary for this but if there isn't conduit already existing it can be in the tens of thousands to do this, just for 100m.

So to exactly answer your question, no there really isn't a cost effective low latency solution. That being said, if ~3-6ms isn't a huge deal you could probably rent roof space at both DCs (usually this can be done for a small fee, in the 100s/mo) and get long range carrier grade wifi gear to connect them (will probably be 2-3k$). If that latency is really too much you'll probably be stuck trying to find someone who has a Metro Ring in the area and seeing if you can hop on/off between the two facilities without having to route through a CO somewhere. That would be much lower latency, but probably pretty costly depending on how much bandwidth you need.

You had some other questions in there about what causes latency, that is probably best saved for a separate question as it applies to general networking. However to briefly answer it, most of the time it is the speed of light. Once you enter a facility the switching and routing is usually done at wire speed and thus doesn't add a significant delay. There are some edge cases like DSL and wireless that have serialization delay where the signaling done on the wire adds some significant overhead, but this is uncommon in data center situations where its usually SONET/ATM or ethernet.

To give an example in a well connected exchange like an Equinix data center you can get to any ISP in there and outside of the building in <1ms.

share|improve this answer

The cost for a data center 100 metres down the road is substantially less

Yes, and guess why - because it has higher latency. Decide and eat it. You wont play HFT games with a oom 100 meters down the road.

THere are specialised hosting oeprations that give you singledigit ms acess to exchagnes. I was quoted 150 USD per month for a 1u server within 3ms of the CME group... and 1500 for something withless than 1ms (significantly).

Now, no whining will make the 100 meter comparable to the expensive offer.... light speed and stuff slow signals down. HFT is a money game, wuere eople buy from specialized companies deep frozen cpus highly overclocked and run special linux kernels that are optimized for network latency.

share|improve this answer
    
do you know what the latency of the speed of light is for 100m? I'll give you a clue...its less than a microsecond. My question was asking what are the major causes of latencies between 2 datacenters and whether you can cross-connect between them....distance is not the deciding factor here. –  DD. Oct 12 '11 at 10:50
    
Yes, but then you adda lot of overhead. Read some networking for dummies, please. –  TomTom Oct 12 '11 at 10:54
    
I guess you have read that book already then. –  DD. Oct 12 '11 at 14:26

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.