Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'd like to use dovecot with sql-based virtual users (which already works fine in my current exim+courier-imapd setup).

In my setup there are "mailboxes" which have a mailboxname@domain and a password. Besides that, there are "addresses" which map actual email addresses to mailboxes.
When logging in via IMAP or POP3 users use the mailbox name and password. So I simply check the mailbox table in the dovecot passdb query which works fine.

The userdb query is kind of a problem though: When a user logs in, the available information is obviously the mailboxname@domain username which can then be used to create the mailbox path (even possible with a static userdb).
When an email is delivered via LMTP, however, I need to query the addresses table to retrieve the destination mailbox - so I'd need a different query in this case.


One possible solution would probably be using some conditionals on the DB level which execute different queries depending on the %s variable (service name, e.g. lmtp) - but obviously that'd be a huge mess.

Another solution might be simply using LDA instead of LMTP as I can them perform the lookup of the mailbox name in exim and simply pass it to the LDA program - but using LDA not only involves an additional process being launched (not that it matters on my low-volume server, but anyway) and probably worse error handling as LDA can only return exit status codes to exim unlike LMTP which probably returns a verbose error message.

So I'd like to know if there's a way to perform different userdb queries depending on where they are used - in a delivery or when accessing a mailbox.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

Dovecot LMTP is wholly unrelated to the IMAP server (and its concomitant login and userdb).

However, ttbomk there is no way to log in/deliver mail using one user and accept mail using another (or an alias).

In postfix, this is trivial to solve by adding a virtual alias map containing the recipient addresses and the LMTP users; this is really not something an LDA should do.

share|improve this answer
    
Ok, so I should probably keep using the LDA so I can perform the mapping in the MTA –  ThiefMaster Oct 25 '11 at 8:57
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.