Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In SharePoint it is possible to configure the Primary and Secondary site collection administrators from SharePoint Central Administration. It is also possible to configure them from the Site Collection Administrators page under Site Settings.

What is the difference between these two? Does it matter in functionality if a user is added to one vs the other?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

As both routeNpingme and Aaron indicated, there isn't a practical upshot from a privileges perspective. Whether an account is added to the Site Collection Administrators group from the site collection provisioning area (in Central Admin) or from within the site collection admin options (in the site collection itself), the resultant permission and privilege set is the same.

There is a big difference worth noting, though, and that revolves around e-mail notifications. In previous SharePoint versions, the "Primary Site Collection Administrator" (as identified by SharePoint within Central Admin) was actually referred to as the "Primary Site Collection Owner." The current version of SharePoint no longer refers to the primary and secondary admins (from within central admin) as "owners," but I believe the underlying behavioral aspects remain the same.

Primary and secondary site collection owners are also site collection administrators, but they receive e-mail notifications pertaining to quotas, user access requests, automatic site deletions (if such behavior is enabled), etc.

For more information, this link: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc288243.aspx. The reference is for WSSv2, I know, but the behaviors are (again, I believe) the same. This is corroborated by the following links for WSSv3 and MOSS 2007 on Microsoft's Office site: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/help/HA101577811033.aspx. Note how the "Manage unused Web sites" section at the end of the page specifically states that the site collection creator is the site collection owner, and that e-mail are sent to the owner and secondary contact.

I hope this helps!

share|improve this answer
    
I discovered that reaching a quota limit e-mails everyone in both locations. We don't use the unused web sites feature so presumably the docs are correct and the behaviour is different?! –  Alex Angas Jul 1 '09 at 10:19
    
Thanks for the update, Alex. This is definitely one of those topics/areas where a "bottom line" guide from Microsoft would help. Of course, it certainly doesn't help that terminology and nomenclature between versions gets changed (e.g., a "virtual server" in V2 is a "web application" in V3) :-) –  Sean McDonough Jul 1 '09 at 17:27
add comment

There is some internal difference (does not affect anything). The effective permissions is the same when you set a site administrator in "Site Settings" versus "Site Collection Administrators" in Central Admin. For example you can set just a primary site collection administrator and add in additional under site settings and they won't show up in Central Administration.

share|improve this answer
add comment

No difference, they both become site collection owners. :)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.