Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I want to know if anybody have done any hands on test mounting NFS on windows xp using "Windows services for unix"

I know that it should work but I want to know if people have had any problem with it or can it reliably replace samba sharing?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

It works in the most technical of senses. Reliability is heavily dependent on consistent and simplistic use. If you just need a few XP clients to connect it will work. If you need to do anything complicated, especially involving user mapping or complicated access controls, it'll probably fail spectacularly.

share|improve this answer
I have rather high bursts of IO, with tens of users each having their own set of permissions. What about the Win 7 support, is it the same? – Ali Nov 22 '11 at 5:06
Win7 support is miles better in terms of reliability, but user mapping and perms are generally similar. The perms problems come from Unix/NFS using much simpler ACEs than Windows. If you can live within the standard UGO/RWX, then you shouldn't have any problems. Side note: Win7 has NFS built in, but only in Enterprise and Ultimate versions; you can't add it on like XP. – Chris S Nov 22 '11 at 13:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.