Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a WCF service app hosted in IIS. On startup, it goes and fetches a really expensive (in terms of time and cpu) resource to use as local cache.

Unfortunately, IIS seems to recycle the process on a fairly regular basis. So I am trying to change the settings on the Application Pool to make sure that IIS does not recycle the application. So far, I've change the following:

  • Limit Interval under CPU from 5 to 0.
  • Idle Time-out under Process Model from 20 to 0.
  • Regular Time Interval under Recycling from 1740 to 0.

Will this be enough? And I have specific questions about the items I changed:

  1. What specifically does Limit Interval setting under CPU mean? Does it mean that if a certain CPU usage is exceeded, the application pool will be recycled?
  2. What exactly does "recycled" mean? Is the application completely torn down and started up again?
  3. What is the difference between "Worker Process shutdown" and "Application Pool recycling"? The documentation for the Idle Time-out under Process Model talks about shutting down the worker process. While the docs for Regular Time Interval under Recycling talk about application pool recycling. I don't quite grok the difference between the two. I thought the w3wp.exe is the worker process which runs the application pool. Can someone explain the difference to the application between the two?

The reason for having IIS7 and IIS7.5 tags is because the app will run in both and hope the answers are the same between the versions.

Image for reference: enter image description here

share|improve this question
up vote 65 down vote accepted


Recycling is usually* where IIS starts up a new process as a container for your application, and then gives the old one up to ShutdownTimeLimit to go away of its own volition before it's killed.

*- usually: see DisallowOverlappingRotation / "Disable overlapped recycle" setting

It is destructive, in that the original process and all its state information are discarded. Using out-of-process session state (eg, State Server or a database, or even a cookie if your state is tiny) can allow you to work around this.

But it is by default overlapped - meaning the duration of an outage is minimized because the new process starts and is hooked up to the request queue, before the old one is told "you have [ShutdownTimeLimit] seconds to go away. Please comply."


To your question: all the settings on that page control recycling in some way. "Shutdown" might be described as "proactive recycling" - where the process itself decides it's time to go, and exits in an orderly manner.

Reactive recycling is where WAS detects a problem and shoots the process (after establishing a suitable replacement W3WP).

Now, here's some stuff that can cause recycling of one form or another:

  • an ISAPI deciding it's unhealthy
  • any module crashing
  • idle timeout
  • cpu limiting
  • adjusting app pool properties
    • as your mum may have screamed at one point: "Stop picking at it, or it'll never get better!"
  • "ping" failure * not actually pinging per se, cos it uses a named pipe - more "life detection"
  • all of the settings in the screenshot above

What To Do:


  • Disable Idle timeouts. 20 minutes of inactivity = boom! New process on the next incoming request. Set that to zero.

  • Disable Regular time interval - the 29 hour default has been described as "insane", "annoying" and "clever" by various parties. Actually, only two of those are true.

  • Optionally Turn on DisallowRotationOnConfigChange (above, Disable Reycling for configuration changes) if you just can't stop playing with it - this allows you to change any app pool setting without it instantly signaling to the worker processes that it needs to be killed. You need to manually recycle the App Pool to get the settings to take effect, which lets you pre-set settings and then use a change window to apply them via your recycle process.

That's enough to cause a well-behaved process to live forever. If it dies, sure, it'll be replaced. If it hangs, pinging should pick that up and a new one should start within 2 minutes (worst-case: ping frequency + ping timeout + startup time limit).

CPU limiting isn't normally interesting, because by default it's turned off, and it's also configured to do nothing anyway; if it were configured to kill the process, sure, that'd be a recycling trigger. Leave it off.

But... then we get into .Net land, and AppDomain recycling, which can also cause a loss of state.

You do that by touching a web.config file in your content folder (again with the picking!), or by creating a folder in that folder, and that's about as destructive as an App Pool recycle, minus the native-code startup costs (it's purely a managed code concept, so only managed code stuff happens here). Antivirus can also trigger this as it scans web.config files, causing a change notification, causing....

share|improve this answer

Kindly check,

Why Do We Recycle Our Application Pools?

if you browse the web to find the reason why application pools are configured to recycle automatically periodically, you’ll be hard pressed to find a reasonable answer that doesn’t pertain to memory issues. It’s like the community in general has pretty much accepted the fact that our web applications (or service layers hosted in IIS) will need to be recycled to avoid memory problems.

I’ve always been of the opinion that if your code requires periodic restarts to keep working correctly, then something is clearly wrong. There is a bug in your code somewhere and you need to fix that, instead of restarting the process occasionally to make the problem ‘go away’.

Really need to start focusing more on memory management in .NET and on making sure that our applications can keep running without problems.

share|improve this answer
fixed badly formatted link... alas, the corrected link is dead. – roufamatic Jul 19 at 16:29

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.