Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In my office, I had to setup new BOX with the following:

BOX - Dell 990, I5 Prosesor, 4 Gb RAM, 500 GB Hard Disk, 2 NIC's

  NIC1 - Connected with D-Link gigabit switch - 30 Users
  NIC2 - Connected with ADSL Modem/Router

OS - Windows Server 2008 R2 AD DS, DNS, DHCP

 Users will get their IP, subnet, DNS, Default gateway from the server.
 Users will be using internet through this server.

How to achieve this?

share|improve this question
As "spirit" says, it is possible. But this box is way to overpowered for this kind of task. Any standard router could do this task at much lower cost. –  duenni Nov 24 '11 at 15:31

1 Answer 1

Well it is pretty much easy in windows 2008 if you install Routing and Remote Access server role. Go to Server Manager -> Add Roles -> And select Routing and Remote Access. Then from the console you can enable and configure routing.

From what you describe on your question you will need to set up your NIC2 as the interface pointing to the internet and you may want to enable NAT for addressing private range of IP Addresses for your internal network.

You can view more info on your problem on this links:

For the distribution of the IP Addresses you will have to install and configure the DHCP Server Role. The DNS Server role will be required for the name resolution on your network, although i think that if you are not planning to make the server Domain Controller it is better to use some other public DNS Servers like the servers on Google ( and

share|improve this answer
All that is unnecessary to setup the server simply as a server. All you need is to add the route to the routine table (check out "ROUTE ADD"), add the relevant firewall rules (if applicable) and you're done. What you're describing is how to setup the server as a NAT device which is a rather different can of worm: the OP better understand the difference before starting in this path. (not that what you said is incorrect, mind you, it's just answering a different question). –  Stephane Nov 24 '11 at 15:38
@Stephane - The question states "Users will be using internet through this server" - while I'd admit it could be a LITTLE clearer, combining that statement with the question title pretty much says that the answer is what Spirit said it is - Install RRAS and yes, you'd be using the server as a NAT device. –  Multiverse IT Nov 27 '11 at 19:27
@MultiverseIT If the network access device (modem or otherwise) already performs NAT, it's unecessary to configure it as well on the server. It can also cause real connection issues. –  Stephane Nov 28 '11 at 10:34
@Stephane - re: Connection issues - sorry, I don't follow. I've setup RRAS for years... I think going back to 2000 for routing. Never seen connection issues and it's proven to be one of the more reliable routers I've used. Indeed, SBS 2003 favored this configuration. Yes, if the router or modem supports NAT I'd go with that in MOST cases, but from the posted question, I'm not sure why you are assuming it does or even exists. –  Multiverse IT Nov 28 '11 at 14:27
@MultiverseIT Simply put: there is plenty of opportunity for NAt to go bad, when you perform two NAT translations using two different systems, you're begging for problems. Add the fact that is is simply not needed and using RRAS if the device in front of the server is already doing NAT is more than pointless. If you really want to do that (and there ARE reasons for this) then at least highlight the fact that you must bridge the modem to the server's external NIC too (and configure the firewall). –  Stephane Nov 29 '11 at 10:21

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.