Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've a group of users, all of which are in a single group. Then I have a Java daemon that is a member of a seperate group.

I want both the users and the daemon to have access to the same set of files. Apparently, adding the daemon to a secondary group so that this works is not generally workable.

What if I give the daemon ownership of files and directories and the group of all users group rights? What sort of problems might I see? Is this bad for security?

Do different UNIX and Linux environments interpret this differently? This environment is Linux: Ubuntu Lucid Lynx (10.04) Server.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

Seems that in such situations is much better to use acl. You need to install acl package and enable it in mount options. For example if /etc/fstab it looks like

/dev/mapper/server-home   /home    ext4    defaults,acl,noatime     0       2

You can manage right with setfacl command and check it with getfacl.

share|improve this answer
    
How do I know if the filesystem supports ACLs? I realize that ext2, ext3, and ext4 have mount options acl and noacl; what is the default? (man pages don't specify) Likewise, are ACLs supported on filesystems like XFS? I think that XFS and many others (JFS, btrfs) will probably support ACLs completely; is this right? Can Java (yes, I know Java comes in many kinds!) handle ACLs or is it transparent? –  Mei Dec 22 '11 at 19:02
    
Oh - and you didn't answer my question :) Aside from "doing the right thing" (using ACLs from the sound of it) I'd also like to know how these permissions resolve themselves and how UNIX/Linux handles it. –  Mei Dec 22 '11 at 19:03

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.