Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I routinely see the following in the logs of a DB2 LUW 9.7.4 server:

-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 11:20 S0000045.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 12:10 S0000046.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 13:05 S0000047.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 13:47 S0000048.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 14:40 S0000049.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 14:50 S0000050.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 14:40 S0000051.LOG

As you can see, log 50 has been written to after log 51 has. If log 51 is no longer the newest, as a secondary log, shouldn't it be deleted?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

Well this means that one of you apps was holding S0000050.LOG for 10 sec longer than S0000051.LOG ..

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.