Tell me more ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote -4 down vote favorite

Is there a complete guide to Xen 4.2? So far I've tryed googling without success could anyone give some good reference preferably freely downloadable.

share|improve this question
2  
What did you type into Google that managed to produce no results? I tried putting your question title in and the only results that were not the required user manual were the manuals for versions 4.0 and 3.0. – Ladadadada Mar 19 '12 at 13:24
@Ladadadada this xen user guide v 4.2. The only Xen guide google posted to me where Xen v3.0. – ineff Mar 19 '12 at 13:31

closed as off topic by Lucas Kauffman, SmallClanger, Chris S♦ Mar 19 '12 at 13:28

Questions on Server Fault are expected to relate to professional server, networking, or related infrastructure administration within the scope defined in the FAQ. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about closed questions here.

1 Answer

up vote 5 down vote

...did you look at the Xen website? I'm not sure what you're looking for that wouldn't be covered there. Otherwise you can look for Xen books on Amazon, but the website may have a lot of material already, or newsgroups/mailing lists to interact with others; if you have a specific question you can post it here. Otherwise this is a wee bit vague as to what you're trying to achieve.

share|improve this answer
First of all, yes I've seen Xen website, but I've found the structures of the wiki fragmentary, in particular I can't find answers to many problems that I'm having. By the way I didn't thought that asking for a guide that someone had used to learn Xen was a so useless question. I apologize. – ineff Mar 19 '12 at 13:29
7  
Well, I didn't vote you down, you were vague in what your actual root problem was, and your snarky reply is not properly formatted because your "first of all" implies a "second" which you didn't get to. If you're going to be sore about it then you're better off saying nothing or clarifying your question so you can get a solution. – Bart Silverstrim Mar 19 '12 at 13:31
Sorry, I'll try to ask a more specific question, I apologize for my bad english and my bad tone. – ineff Mar 19 '12 at 13:37

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.