Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

According to the documentation, a management group should have an odd number of managers greater than 1. I have a four node SAN consisting of P4500 G2s. I plan on having two clusters with two nodes each in this management group, i.e.:


Are there any issues running standard managers on Node1, Node2, and Node3? After reading the documentation, I'm still unclear about whether or not cluster membership matters in quorum consistency, or if they don't matter at all.

share|improve this question

HP advised me to have 4 regular managers (1 on each node) and a Failover Manager (FOM) configured for quorum consistency in a management group that has two clusters, with two nodes for each cluster.

For example, let's say you need to update the firmware on Node 3 in Cluster 2. If you have Node 4 running a regular manager, and a FOM in place, you can bring Node 3 down without loosing any quorum consistency. When Node 3 comes back online, it will take approximately 15 minutes for it to re-sync its data with the cluster.

Another alternative is to use a "Virtual Manager". From HP:

A Virtual Manager is added to a management group, as shown in Figure 52 on page 151, but is not started on a storage system until a failure in the system causes a loss of quorum. Unlike the Failover Manager, which is always running, the Virtual Manager must be started manually on a storage system after quorum is lost. It is designed to be used in two-system or two-site system configurations which are at risk for a loss of quorum

As a small side note, you do not want to use a FOM and a Virtual Manager together, its either one or the other.....

If you have an HP Passport, you can go to this link to download a ESX, Hyper-V, or standalone version of the FOM:

Scroll to the bottom of the page, click "Receive for free" and sign in with your HP Passport.


HP StorageWorks P4000 SAN Solution user guide

share|improve this answer
I understand why you don't want to run an even number of managers. What would be the issue with running three managers and not having Node4 run any at all? It seems that doing this would allow me to avoid having to install a FOM. In fact, on page 149 of that document, it says to run three managers on a 4 node configuration and doesn't mention that a FOM is needed. My question is about whether or not multiple clusters within a management group impact this guideline. – MDMarra Mar 19 '12 at 17:38
In fact, after creating the actual clusters and assigning nodes, the best practice analyzer recommended that I run three managers total across both clusters, negating the need for a FOM. – MDMarra Mar 19 '12 at 23:12
up vote 1 down vote accepted

After testing and re-reading the HP documentation and consulting the Best Practices Summary of the CMC, it appears that running standard managers on 3 of the 4 nodes is the "correct" way to do this.

Since quorums are per management group and not per cluster, the fact that the four storage nodes are in two separate clusters is not relevant in this case.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.