Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I verify the fingerprint of a self-signed SSL certificate on the client, can a man-in-the-middle attack still occur?

share|improve this question
You can create your own certificate authority (CA), and distribute the public CA cert to all the clients who will be connecting to a server with certs signed by that CA. Then they'll work just like any other certificate. Just make sure to guard the CA key. – Patrick Mar 24 '12 at 2:40
@Patrick may be a good place to start for people who aren't familiar with running a CA already. Makes the process fairly easy. – Chris S Mar 24 '12 at 14:22

Only if they manage to actually reproduce the fingerprint, which is much, much harder.

The Fingerprint is actually the most reliable method of determining a certificate is what it should be. It's just ignored by just about everyone.

share|improve this answer

A self signed certificate is just as "secure" as a CA issued certificate given the same cryptographic specifications. All the same vulnerabilities and strengths are there.

The only difference is that clients generally have a preconfigured list of trusted CAs and will not ask, where they'll always initially ask for self-signed. Which it sounds like you're already aware of.

share|improve this answer
1. "All the same vulnerabilities and strengths are there." man-in-the-middle not applicable to vulnerabilities and strengths 2. You did answer on clearly asked question at all. Downvote, ace of diamonds – Lazy Badger Mar 24 '12 at 4:40
Erh, no he did answer the question correctly imo. I think you are the one that's talking bs. – Lucas Kauffman Mar 24 '12 at 7:33
@LazyBadger I don't think you understand security, perhaps you should read up on MITM attacks and how they can apply to HTTPS communication. My answer implies that using a self signed certificate makes it no more or less likely that a MITM attack can be performed. If you are having trouble understanding you should ask for help. – Chris S Mar 24 '12 at 14:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.