Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

iptables -N NEW_TCP_PACKETS_NO_SYN

iptables -A INPUT NEW_TCP_PACKETS_NO_SYN -p tcp ! --syn -m state --state NEW -m limit --limit 10/day -j LOG --log-prefix "New packets but not syn:"

iptables -A INPUT NEW_TCP_PACKETS_NO_SYN -p tcp ! --syn -m state --state NEW -j DROP

iptables -A INPUT NEW_TCP_PACKETS_NO_SYN -f -j DROP

1) I'm making a new user generated chain with the -N option
2) I'm logging NEW packets that aren't syn, and I'm adding a limit trying to prevent my log files from getting flooded
3) I'm dropping the NEW packets that aren't SYN
4) I'm using -f because I'm left with the fragmented packets, and I want to drop those packets.

A recommendation to improve something similar was found here http://serverfault.com/a/245713/114606 , which is to add it in -t raw -A PREROUTING

A) I don't quite understand what's being said, how do I add it "in" ?
And it seems like a risky thing to do, because it sets a mark on packets that they should not be handled by the connection tracking system.

B) And why is that necessary ? I'm dropping those packets so what exactly is the benefit of marking those packets ?

All that being said, is there anything that can be done when I do get the initial SYN fragment, but I don't get the last one ?

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.